The High Court dismissed the civil miscellaneous review application as infructuous, noting that the applicant's counsel submitted that the application had become devoid of utility. No substantive legal principle was carved out.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Neutral Citation No. - 2023:AHC:215331
Court No. - 52
Case :- CIVIL MISC REVIEW APPLICATION No. - 477 of 2023
Applicant :- Arun Kumar Tripathi Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. And 3 Others Counsel for Applicant :- Pratik Chandra Counsel for Opposite Party :- C.S.C.
Hon'ble Saurabh Srivastava,J.
Order Date :- 7.11.2023 Shaswat
Digitally signed by :- SHASWAT SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Arun Kumar Tripathi
Hon'ble Saurabh Srivastava,J.
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
