Writ petition dismissed for want of prosecution as the petitioner was absent during the hearing despite a revised call.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 52
Case :- WRIT - C No. - 20630 of 2020
Petitioner :- Chotey Lal Pachauri Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 7 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Sunil Kumar Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Rang Nath Pandey
Hon'ble Saurabh Srivastava,J.
Even in the revised call, none present on behalf of the petitioner.
Learned Standing counsel for the State respondent is present.
The writ petition stands dismissed for want of prosecution .
Interim order, if any, stands vacated.
Order Date :- 6.11.2023 Shaswat
Digitally signed by :- SHASWAT SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Chotey Lal Pachauri
State Of U.P.
Saurabh Srivastava
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
