Code No. 9, a civil misc review application was dismissed as not pressed. The court clarified that no liberty is granted to file a fresh modification application regarding a prior PIL order.
Petition dismissed as not pressed. No liberty granted to file fresh modification application.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 9
Case :- CIVIL MISC REVIEW APPLICATION No. - 35 of 2023
Applicant :- Rojan Ansari Opposite Party :- State Of U P And 9 Others Counsel for Applicant :- Kailash Singh Yadav Counsel for Opposite Party :- C.S.C.,Bhupendra Kumar Tripathi
Hon'ble Prakash Padia,J.
After some argument, a prayer has been made by counsel for the petitioner to dismiss the present petition as not pressed.
In view of the above, the present petition is dismissed as not pressed.
It is made clear that no liberty is granted to the petitioner to file a fresh modification application in respect of the order passed by this Court on 20.12.2022 in PIL No. 2456 of 2022.
Order Date :- 27.1.2023 S.K.
Digitally signed by :- SWEETY KANOJIA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Rojan Ansari
State Of U P
Prakash Padia
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
