The applicant failed to appear. The opposite party filed a counter-affidavit admitting possession of respective lands without violating the 1988 Writ Court order. The court found no violation and dismissed the contempt application.
Contempt application dismissed and contempt notice discharged.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Neutral Citation No. - 2023:AHC:184258
Court No. - 9
Case :- CONTEMPT APPLICATION (CIVIL) No. - 6963 of 2022
Applicant :- Kripa Shankar Jaiswal Opposite Party :- Dr. Atul Kumar Guptapresently Posted As S.D.M. And 2 Others
Counsel for Applicant :- Vinod Kumar Rai,Ashok Kumar Singh Counsel for Opposite Party :- Pramod Kumar,Babu Lal Ram
Hon'ble Rohit Ranjan Agarwal,J.
No one is present on behalf of the applicant to press the application, however, Sri Babu Lal Ram, learned counsel, has put in appearance on behalf of opposite party nos. 2 and 3.
File consign to record.
Order Date :- 22.9.2023 Shekhar
Digitally signed by :- SHASHI SHEKHAR PANDEY High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the opposite parties violated the interim order of the Writ Court.
Whether the facts established in the counter-affidavit support a finding of contempt.
Kripa Shankar Jaiswal
Dr. Atul Kumar Gupta
Rohit Ranjan Agarwal
Shashi Shekhar Pandey
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
