Disposed

Yogendra Singh v. Vivek Kumar Singh, Additional Commissioner (Accounts) Revenue Board and Another

Allahabad HC5 Sept 2023CAPL/6368/2023

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

In this contempt application, the High Court held that while a prima facie case exists for willful disobedience, the respondent requires notice. The court granted the respondent three months to comply with the impugned writ order.

What did the court decide?

Granted three months further time to the opposite party to comply with the judgment dated 23.03.2023.

Yogendra Singh Vs Vivek Kumar Singh, Additional Commissioner (Accounts) Revenue Board and Another — Allahabad HC (2023) — LawSathi Research

¶1

Neutral Citation No. - 2023:AHC:175191

¶2

Court No. - 9

¶3

Case :- CONTEMPT APPLICATION (CIVIL) No. - 6368 of 2023

¶4

Applicant :- Yogendra Singh Opposite Party :- Vivek Kumar Singh, Additional Commissioner (Accounts) Revenue Board And Another Counsel for Applicant :- Arvind Kumar Tiwari

¶5

Hon'ble Rohit Ranjan Agarwal,J.

¶6

The present contempt application has been filed under Section 12 of the Contempt of Courts Act for punishing the Opposite Party for willful disobedience of the judgment and order dated 23.03.2023 passed by this Court in Writ Petition No. 5004 of 2023.

¶7

It is contended that applicant had approached writ Court through aforesaid writ petition, which was disposed of vide order dated 23.03.2023. Copy of the order of writ Court was served upon opposite party on 18.04.2023, but according to the applicant, the said order has not been complied with by the opposite party till date.

¶8

Prima facie , a case has been made out for punishing the opposite party for willful disobedience of the judgment and order passed in the aforesaid writ petition.

¶9

However, no notice is issued to the opposite party at this stage. The opposite party is granted three months’ further time to comply with the order dated 23.03.2023 passed by this Court in Writ Petition No. 5004 of 2023 from the date of production of a certified copy of this order.

¶10

The applicant shall supply a duly stamped registered envelope addressed to the opposite party and another self-addressed

¶11

envelope to the office within two weeks from today. The office shall send a copy of this order along with the self-addressed envelope of the applicant with a copy of contempt application to the opposite party within one week thereafter and keep a record thereof.

¶12

The opposite party shall comply with the directions of the writ court and intimate the applicant the order through the selfaddressed envelop within a week thereafter.

¶13

In case, the opposite party does not comply with the order, it would be open to the applicant to approach this court again.

¶14

With the aforesaid observations, this application is finally disposed of at this stage.

¶15

Order Date :- 5.9.2023 V.S.Singh

¶16

Digitally signed by :- VIDYA SAGAR SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

Yogendra Singh v. Vivek Kumar Singh, Additional Commissioner (Accounts) Revenue Board and Another

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Yogendra Singh v. Vivek Kumar Singh, Additional Commissioner (Accounts) Revenue Board and Another

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Karn Singh Vs K. Bala Ji, District Magistrate

Divyansh Kumar Singh Vs Sarneet Kaur Broka, Director, Bal Vikas Seva Evam Puhtahar

Hemraj Yadav Vs Yogesh Kumar Gaund, Sub Divisional Magistrate and 7 Others

Shubhavati Devi Vs Mohammad Faruqee, Sub Divisional Magistrate

Mahendra Singh Vs Shri Manish Kumar Verma, Collector

Smt. Neeru Gautam Vs Devendra Gautam, Registrar(Birth and Death)