Disposed

Divyansh Kumar Singh v. Sarneet Kaur Broka, Director, Bal Vikas Seva Evam Puhtahar

Allahabad HC4 Sept 2023CAPL/6286/2023

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

In a contempt application filed for willful disobedience of a writ order, the High Court found a prima facie case but withheld issuing notice. The respondent was granted three months to comply with the previous order and inform the applicant.

What did the court decide?

Respondent granted three months time to comply with the order dated 30.05.2023 and intimate the applicant.

Divyansh Kumar Singh Vs Sarneet Kaur Broka, Director… — Contempt of Court | Allahabad HC (2023)

¶1

Neutral Citation No. - 2023:AHC:175095

¶2

Court No. - 9

¶3

Case :- CONTEMPT APPLICATION (CIVIL) No. - 6286 of 2023

¶4

Applicant :- Divyansh Kumar Singh Opposite Party :- Sarneet Kaur Broka, Director, Bal Vikas Seva Evam Puhtahar Counsel for Applicant :- Ram Narain

¶5

Hon'ble Rohit Ranjan Agarwal,J.

¶6

The present contempt application has been filed under Section 12 of the Contempt of Courts Act for punishing the Opposite Party for willful disobedience of the judgment and order dated 30.05.2023 passed by this Court in Writ Petition No.7561 of 2023.

¶7

It is contended that applicant had filed aforesaid writ, which was disposed of vide order dated 30.05.2023. Copy of the said order was served to the opposite party through registered post on 19.06.2023, but the said direction has not been complied with by the opposite party till date.

¶8

Prima facie, a case has been made out for punishing the opposite party for willful disobedience of the judgment and order passed in the aforesaid writ petition.

¶9

However, no notice is issued to the opposite party at this stage. The opposite party is granted three months’ further time to comply with the order dated 30.05.2023 passed by this Court in Writ Petition No.7561 of 2023 from the date of production of a certified copy of this order.

¶10

The applicant shall supply a duly stamped registered envelope addressed to the opposite party and another self-addressed envelope to the office within one week from today. The office

¶11

shall send a copy of this order along with the self-addressed envelope of the applicant with a copy of contempt application to the opposite party within one week thereafter and keep a record thereof.

¶12

The opposite party shall comply with the directions of the writ court and intimate the applicant the order through the selfaddressed envelop within a week thereafter.

¶13

In case, the opposite party does not comply with the order, it would be open to the applicant to approach this court again.

¶14

With the aforesaid observations, this application is finally disposed of at this stage.

¶15

Order Date :- 4.9.2023 SK Goswami

¶16

Digitally signed by :- SHIVAKANT GOSWAMI High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

Divyansh Kumar Singh v. Sarneet Kaur Broka, Director, Bal Vikas Seva Evam Puhtahar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Divyansh Kumar Singh v. Sarneet Kaur Broka, Director, Bal Vikas Seva Evam Puhtahar

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Surendra Singh Vs Deepak Kumar, Principal Secretary, Secondary Education and 2 Others

Dheeraj Babu Vs Sri Rahul Pawar, District Basic Education Officer and Another

Vishwanath Prasad Gupta Vs Sri Satya Narain Singh,Director Ayurvdik

Karn Singh Vs K. Bala Ji, District Magistrate

Hemraj Yadav Vs Yogesh Kumar Gaund, Sub Divisional Magistrate and 7 Others

Shubhavati Devi Vs Mohammad Faruqee, Sub Divisional Magistrate