Contempt application dismissed for want of prosecution as the applicant did not appear to press the petition and sought no adjournment.
The contempt petition was dismissed for want of prosecution.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Neutral Citation No. - 2023:AHC-LKO:73524
Court No. - 4
Case :- CONTEMPT APPLICATION (CIVIL) No. - 2516 of 2017
Applicant :- Sri Ram Opposite Party :- Shubhra Saxena D.M Hardoi Counsel for Applicant :- Sushil Kumar Singh
Hon'ble Rajesh Singh Chauhan,J.
1. This contempt petition is of the year 2017.
2. Case called out.
3. None appeared on behalf of the petitioner to press this contempt petition nor any request for adjournment of the case has been sought.
4. Accordingly, the instant contempt petition is dismissed for want of prosecution.
5. Notice, if any, stands discharged.
[Rajesh Singh Chauhan,J.]
Order Date :- 7.11.2023 Suresh/
Digitally signed by :- SURESH CHANDRA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench
Sri Ram
Rajesh Singh Chauhan
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
