A brief in a contempt application under Civil No. 1929 of 2017 was dismissed for want of prosecution in the absence of the petitioner on the hearing date.
Contempt application dismissed for want of prosecution; notices discharged.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Neutral Citation No. - 2023:AHC-LKO:71782
Court No. - 4
Case :- CONTEMPT APPLICATION (CIVIL) No. - 1929 of 2017 Applicant :- Jai Narayan Opposite Party :- Sachin Kumar Station Officer Of P.S. Sadarpur Sitapur And Anr
Counsel for Applicant :- Vimal Kishor Singh
Hon'ble Rajesh Singh Chauhan,J.
Case called out.
This case is of the year 2017.
None appears for the petitioner to press this contempt petition nor there is any request to adjourn or pass over the case.
However, learned Standing Counsel is present for the State.
The contempt petition is dismissed for want of prosecution .
Notices, if any, stands discharged.
Order Date :- 1.11.2023 Om
Digitally signed by :- OM PRAKASH MISHRA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, Lucknow Bench
Jai Narayan
State
Rajesh Singh Chauhan
Om Prakash Mishra
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
