Rajkumar v. State of U.P. and 3 Others
Case brief
What is this about?
In an ex-parte bail cancellation application, the single-judge bench dismissed the application for want of prosecution as the applicant failed to appear.
In an ex-parte bail cancellation application, the single-judge bench dismissed the application for want of prosecution as the applicant failed to appear.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Neutral Citation No. - 2023:AHC:99853
Court No. - 88
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL CANCELLATION APPLICATION No. - 93 of 2021
Applicant :- Rajkumar Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. And 3 Others Counsel for Applicant :- Mohd. Shahanshah Khan Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.,Mahesh Dwivedi,Saroj Kumar Yadav
Hon'ble Vikram D. Chauhan,J.
List has been revised. No one appears on behalf of the applicant to press this application.
The application is dismissed for want of prosecution.
Order Date :- 9.5.2023 Bhaskar
Digitally signed by :- BHASKAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Rajkumar
State Of U.P.
Vikram D. Chauhan
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court