Sompal Singh v. State of U.P. and Another
Case brief
What is this about?
This application challenges the cancellation of bail granted under Section 437(2) CrPC. The court observed that the applicant was not given an opportunity to approach the High Court before the cancellation order, raising concerns about procedural fairness under Section 438 CrPC and Section 2(c) of the Lalitpur Authority, 2018.
What the court decided
Neutral Citation No. - 2023:AHC:180344
Court No. - 68
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL CANCELLATION APPLICATION No. - 83 of 2023
Applicant :- Sompal Singh Opposite Party :- State of U.P. and Another Counsel for Applicant :- Kripa Shanker Yadav,Manish Dev Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.,Dushyant Kumar
Hon'ble Dr. Gautam Chowdhary,J.
orZeku nkf.Md izdh.kZ tekur fujLrhdj.k izkFkZuk i=] oknh@izFkelwpukdrkZ lkseiky flag dh vksj ls eq0v0la0 187 lu 2022] vUrxZr /kkjk 302 Hkk0na0fo0] Fkkuk Bkdqj}kjk] ftyk eqjknkckn esa vfHk;qDr@foi{kh la0 2 vfer dh tekur fujLr djus gsrq izLrqr fd;k x;k gSA
oknh@izFkelwpukdrkZ ds fo}ku vf/koDrk ,oa fo}ku vij 'kkldh; vf/koDrk dks lquk rFkk i=koyh dk ifj’khyu fd;kA
vkosnd@izFkelwpukdrkZ ds fo}ku vf/koDrk dk dFku gS fd foi{kh la0 2 dks tekur] tekur vkns’k eas fufgr 'krksZ ds v/khu nh x;h Fkh fdUrq foi{kh la0 2@vfHk;qDr us tekur vkns’k esa fufgr 'krksZ dk mYya?ku fd;k gS] mlds }kjk oknh ,oa mlds xokgksa dks Mjk;k&/kedk;k tk jgk gS] bl laca/k esa izFkelwpukdrkZ }kjk iqfyl@iz’kklfud vf/kdkfj;ksa ds le{k vkosnu i= Hkh izLrqr fd;k x;k gSA
fo}ku vij 'kkldh; vf/koDrk dk dFku gS fd izFkelwpukdrkZ@oknh ds ikl lk{kh laj{k.k Ldhe] 2018 ds rgr ;g mik; miyC/k gS vkSj mlds }kjk tekur fujLrhdj.k vkosnu i= izLrqr djus ds ctk; lk{kh laj{k.k Ldhe] 2018 ds rgr izFkelwpukdrkZ@xokgksa dks miyC/k djk;h x;h lqj{kk ds izdk’k esa bl tekur fujLrhdj.k vkosnu i= dk fuLrkj.k fd;k tk ldrk gSA
Issues for consideration
3 issues framed by the court
Whether cancellation of bail granted under Section 437(2) CrPC is permissible given the procedural lack of meeting the阈值 of Section 2(c) Lalitpur Authority, 2018.
Whether the requirement of Section 437(2) CrPC to meet the Lalitpur Authority threshold of Section 2(c) for cancellation of bail was met.
Whether the applicant was provided an opportunity to be heard before cancellation of bail.
Parties & counsel
- applicant
Sompal Singh
Coram
Dr. Gautam Chowdhary
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Allahabad HC
- Decided on
- · September
- Registered
- Case no.
- BAILC/83/2023
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court