Allowed

Kaluram Sagar v. State of U.P.

Allahabad HC15 Sept 2023BAIL/14238/2023

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

Single judge allowed criminal miscellaneous bail application. Considering the applicant is the sole breadwinner with young children and the nature of offences is of delay and denial, bail was granted subject to surrendering the accused bond.

What did the court decide?

Released on bail subject to conditions of appearing in court, not disturbing witnesses, and complying with bail regulations.

Kaluram Sagar Vs State of U.P. — Bail and Remand | Allahabad HC (2023)

¶1

Neutral Citation No. - 2023:AHC:179121

¶2

Court No. - 68

¶3

Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 14238 of 2023

¶4

Applicant :- Kaluram Sagar Opposite Party :- State of U.P. Counsel for Applicant :- Aditya Vardhan Singh,Pandey Balkrishna,Rajeev Sawhney Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.

¶5

Hon'ble Dr. Gautam Chowdhary,J.

¶6

orZeku nkf.Md izdh.kZ tekur izkFkZuk i=] vkosnd dkywjke lkxj dh vksj ls eq0v0la0 415 lu 2022] vUrxZr /kkjk 498&,] 323] 304&ch Hkk0na0fo0 rFkk 3@4 ngst izfr"ks/k vf/kfu;e] Fkkuk bdksVsd&3] ftyk xkSre cq) uxj esa tekur ij eqDr djus gsrq izLrqr fd;k x;k gSA

¶7

vkosnd ds fo}ku vf/koDrk ,oa fo}ku vij 'kkldh; vf/koDrk dks lquk rFkk i=koyh dk ifj’khyu fd;kA

¶8

vkosnd ds fo}ku vf/koDrk dk dFku gS fd vkosnd dks bl izdj.k esa xyr ,oa QthZ rjhds ls >wBk QWlk;k x;k gS] mlus dfFkr vijk/k dkfjr ugha fd;k gS] vkosnd us erdk ls dHkh ngst dh ekWx ugha dh vkSj u gh blds fy, mls izrkfM+r fd;k] vkosnd ds ikl ls mls rFkkdfFkr ?kVuk esa lafyIr djus okyh dksbZ oLrq cjken ugha gq;h gS] erdk us Lo;a QWklh yxkdj vkRegR;k fd;k gS ftldh lwpuk vkosnd us gh erdk ds ek;ds okyksa dks nh Fkh] vkosnd ,oa erdk ds 2 cPps gSa tks ukuk&ukuh ds ikl jg jgs gSa] vkosnd ds firk fodykax gSa rFkk ifjokj esa flQZ vkosnd gh dekus okyk O;fDr gS] mlds tsy esa fu:) jgus ls cPpksa dh mfpr ns[kjs[k djus okyk ,oa ?kj dk thfodksiktZu djus okyk vU; dksbZ lnL; ugha gS] vkosnd funksZ"k gS rFkk og bl izdj.k esa fn0 5&10&2022 ls dkjkxkj es a fu:) gS] blfy, vkosnd dks tekur ij NksM+ fn;k tk;A

¶9

fo}ku vij 'kkldh; vf/koDrk us vkosnd ds fo}ku vf/koDrk ds rdksZ dk izcy fojks/k djrs gq, rdZ izLrqr fd;k fd vkosnd }kjk dkfjr vijk/k laKs; ,oa xEHkhj izd`fr dk gS] blfy, vkosnd dks tekur ij u NksM+k tk;A

¶10

vkosnd ds fo}ku vf/koDrk ds rdksZ ds ifjizs{; esa i=koyh ij miyC/k lkjoku rF;ksa ,oa ifjfLFkfr;ksa dk lexz :i ls voyksdu djus ds ckn] lcwrksa dh izd`fr vkSj fdlh Hkh Bksl fojks/kkRed lkexzh dh vuqifLFkfr ,oa miyC/k lkexzh ls NsM+NkM+ dh laHkkouk u gksus ds rF; dks ns[krs gq, esjh jk; esa vkosnd dks tekur ij eqDr djus dk mi;qDr vk/kkj gSA

¶11

vr% okn ds xq.k nks"k ij fcuk dksbZ fVIi.kh fd, gq, vkosnd dks mijksDr of.kZr vijk/k esa lacaf/kr U;k;ky; dh lUrqf"V ij O;fDrxr ca/k&i= ,oa vf/kd /kujkf’k ds nks LFkkuh; izfrHkw izLrqr djus ij fuEufyf[kr 'krksZ ds lkFk tekur ij NksM+ fn;k tk;A

¶12

1& vkosnd foospuk ;k ijh{k.k ds nkSjku vfHk;kstu lk{;ksa ds lkFk NsM + NkM+ ugha djsxkA

¶13

2& vkosnd vfHk;kstu lkf{k;ksa o ihfM+r@f’kdk;rdrkZ dks Mjk;sxk@/kedk;sxk ughaA

¶14

3& vkosnd U;k;ky; ds vkns’kksa dk ikyu djsxk] og ijh{k.k ds nkSjku fcuk dksbZ vuko’;d LFkxu fy, fu;r frfFk ij U;k;ky; esa mifLFkr gksxk rFkk ijh{k.k esa bZekunkjh ls lg;ksx djsxkA

¶15

4& vkosnd tekur ij fjgk gksus ds ckn tekur dh Lora=rk dk nq:i;ksx ugha djsxk vkSj fdlh Hkh vijkf/kd xfrfof/k esa fyIr ugha gksxk u dksbZ vijkf/kd d`R; djsxkA

¶16

5& vkosnd izR;{k ;k vizR;{k :i ls ekeys ds rF;ksa ls ifjfpr fdlh Hkh O;fDr ;k iqfyl vf/kdkfj;ksa dks dksbZ izyksHku ;k /kedh ugha nsxk u gh muls dksbZ ok;nk djsxk] ftlds dkj.k mUgsa U;k;ky; esa rF;ksa dks mtkxj djus ls fojr jguk iM+sA

¶17

mijksDr 'krksZ esa ls fdlh ds mYya?ku ds ekeys esa] ijh{k.k U;k;ky; vkosnd dh tekur fu;ekuqlkj jn~n djus dks Lora= gSA

¶18

fn0 % 15&9&2023 ds0lh0flag

¶19

2 of 2

¶20

Digitally signed by :- KAILASH CHANDRA SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

Kaluram Sagar v. State of U.P.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Kaluram Sagar v. State of U.P.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Vineet Vs State of U.P.

Narendra Vs State of U.P.

Saurabh Vs State of U.P. and 3 Others

Ratnesh Vs State of U.P.

Mohd Irshad Khan Alias Ayyub Vs State of U.P.

Abdul Mannan @ Guddu Vs State of U.P.