Smt Baby Savita v. State of U.P.and Another
Case brief
What is this about?
The application was dismissed for want of prosecution as the applicant did not appear to press the matter when listed.
The application was dismissed for want of prosecution as the applicant did not appear to press the matter when listed.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 88
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL CANCELLATION APPLICATION No. - 81 of 2020
Applicant :- Smt Baby Savita Opposite Party :- State Of U.P.And Another Counsel for Applicant :- Deenanath Mishra Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.
Hon'ble Vikram D. Chauhan,J.
List has been revised. No one appears to press this application.
The application is dismissed for want of prosecution.
Order Date :- 24.4.2023 Bhaskar
Digitally signed by :- BHASKAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Smt Baby Savita
State Of U.P.
Vikram D. Chauhan
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court