Judgment dismissing an application for cancellation of bail on the grounds that the applicant failed to file a substitute bail application within the mandated one-month period after acquittal.
Bail application was dismissed and the previous bail was cancelled.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Neutral Citation No. - 2023:AHC:200595
Court No. - 68
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL CANCELLATION APPLICATION No. - 80 of 2019
Applicant :- Mantasha Islam Opposite Party :- State of U.P. and Another Counsel for Applicant :- Vimal Dharm Yadav,Bharat Kishore Srivastava Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.,Ashutosh Srivastava,Chandra Prakash Srivastava
Hon'ble Dr. Gautam Chowdhary,J.
रम ससूचनमाकरमार दमारमा पमुजलस /्ቚशमासननक अजधकमाररयोሻ कसे समक आवसेदन पत भती ्ቚस्रमुर नकयमा रयमा हहै।
रम ससूचनमाकरमार/ रवमाहोሻ कमो उपलब्ध करमायती रयती समुरकमा कसे ्ቚकमाश मम इस जममानर ननरस्रतीकरर आवसेदन पत कमा ननस्रमारर नकयमा जमा सकरमा हहै।
(2019) 14 SCC 615 मम मसंजसूदती दसे दती हहै।
Order Date :- 17.10.2023 CP.sahani
Digitally signed by :- CHANDRA PRAKASH SAHANI High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the bail application should be dismissed for not being filed under Section 437 Cr.P.C. within the prescribed timeframe?
Mantasha Islam
State of U.P.
Gautam Chowdhary
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
