A criminal bail cancellation application where the applicant alleged threats by the accused. The High Court observed that the applicant has a remedy under the Witness Protection Scheme, 2018, and did not entertain the application further.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Neutral Citation No. - 2023:AHC:200907
Court No. - 68
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL CANCELLATION APPLICATION No. - 188 of 2023
Applicant :- Harendar Singh Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. And Nother Counsel for Applicant :- Babloo Pant Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.,Devesh Kumar Shukla,Dharmesh Kumar Shukla
Hon'ble Dr. Gautam Chowdhary,J.
Order Date :- 17.10.2023/RPD
Digitally signed by :- RATAN PRAKASH DWIVEDI High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
1 issue framed by the court
whether the applicant has any remedy under the Witness Protection Scheme, 2018 to address threats from the accused who was granted bail
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
Mahender Chawla and others Vs. Union of IndiaReferred¶10
Mahender Chawla and others Vs. Union of India reported in (2019) 14 SCC 615 · Who else cites this
Harendar Singh
Opposite Party No. 2
Gautam Chowdhary
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
