In a bail cancellation matter, the learned trial court held that the evidence adduced did not justify a conclusion that bail had been properly cancelled. The High Court condoned the delay and set aside the order cancelling bail.
The order of bail cancellation dated 24-5-2022 by the learned trial court was set aside.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 78
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL CANCELLATION APPLICATION No. - 599 of 2022
Applicant :- Kripa Shankar Shukla Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. And Another Counsel for Applicant :- Mohd. Samiuzzaman Khan Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.
Hon'ble Dr. Gautam Chowdhary,J.
orZeku nkf.Md izdh.kZ tekur fujLrhdj.k izkFkZuk i=] vkosnd dik 'kadj 'kqDyk dh vksj ls foi{kh la0 2 fouhr f}osnh dh tekur] tekur vkosnu i= la0 16599 lu 2022 esa ekuuh; U;k;ewfrZ Jh vthr flag }kjk Lohdr fd, x, tekur vkns’k fn0 24&5&2022] ftlds }kjk foi{kh la0 2 fouhr f}osnh dh tekur eq0v0la0 07 lu 2021] vUrxZr /kkjk 306] 506 Hkk0na0fo0] Fkkuk Sisamau] ftyk dkuiqj uxj esa Lohd`r dh x;h gS] dks fujLr djus gsrq izLrqr fd;k x;k gSA
vkosnd ds fo}ku vf/koDrk] foi{kh la0 2 ds fo}ku vf/koDrk ,oa fo}ku vij 'kkldh; vf/koDrk dks lquk rFkk i=koyh dk ifj’khyu fd;kA
vkosnd ds fo}ku vf/koDrk us rdZ izLrqr fd;k fd foi{kh la0 2 us tekur ij eqDr gksus ds i’pkr vkosnd dks ijs’kku djuk izkjEHk dj fn;k gS rFkk og mls ekjus dh /kedh nsrk gS] foi{kh la0 2 vkijkf/kd izo`fRr dk O;fDr gS] mlh ds mRihM+u djus ls oknh ds yM+ds us rax vkdj vkRegR;k fd;k Fkk] blfy, foi{kh la0 2 dk tekur vkns’k fn0 24&5&2022 vikLr dj fn;k tk;A
foi{kh la0 2 ds fo}ku vf/koDrk ,oa fo}ku vij 'kkldh; vf/koDrk us vkosnd ds fo}ku vf/koDrk ds rdksZ dk izcy fojks/k fd;k rFkk dFku fd;k fd vkosnd }kjk dksbZ ,slk lk{; ugha izLrqr fd;k tk jgk gS ftlls fl) gks fd foi{kh la0 2 }kjk vkosnd dks ijs’kku fd;k tk jgk gS vkSj mls tku ls ekjus dh /kedh nh tk jgh gks] blfy, vkosnd }kjk izLrqr ;g tekur fujLrhdj.k vkosnu i= cyghu gS vkSj fujLr fd, tkus ;ksX; gSA
foi{kh la0 2 ds fo}ku vf/koDrk ,oa fo}ku vij 'kkldh; vf/koDrk ds rdksZ ds ifjisz{; esa vkosnd }kjk izLrqr tekur fujLrhdj.k vkosnu i= Lohdkj djus rFkk foi{kh la0 2 dh tekur fujLr djus dk dksbZ vkSfpR; ugha gS rFkk ;g tekur fujLrhdj.k vkosnu i= fujLr fd, tkus ;ksX; gSA
rn~uqlkj okn ds xq.k nks"k ij fcuk dksbZ fVIi.kh fd, gq,] vkosnd dk tekur fujLrhdj.k vkosnu i= fujLr fd;k tkrk gSA fn0 % 22&3&2023
ds0lh0flag
Digitally signed by :- KAILASH CHANDRA SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the order of bail cancellation is liable to be set aside for lack of sufficient material.
Kripa Shankar Shukla
State Of U.P.
Gautam Chowdhary
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
