Allowed

Salman v. State of U.P. and 3 Others

Allahabad HC22 Mar 2023BAIL/5878/2023

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

High Court granted bail to Salman in a case involving alleged assault, threat, and intimidation. The Court held the arrest was illegal as no substantial evidence was recorded, accused was family member, and delay in filing charge sheet.

What did the court decide?

Bail granted. The accused is released on bail. The trial court is directed to examine the other two accused and the witness under Section 161-164 CrPC before recording a report against the accused.

Salman Vs State of U.P. and 3 Others — Bail and Remand | Allahabad HC (2023)

¶1

Court No. - 78

¶2

Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 5878 of 2023

¶3

Applicant :- Salman Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. And 3 Others Counsel for Applicant :- Amit Rai Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.

¶4

Hon'ble Dr. Gautam Chowdhary,J.

¶5

orZeku nkf.Md izdh.kZ tekur izkFkZuk i=] vkosnd lyeku dh vksj ls eq0v0la0 518 lu 2022] vUrxZr /kkjk 452] 376@511] 504] 506 Hkk0na0fo0 ,oa 7@8 ikDlks ,sDV] Fkkuk uthckckn] ftyk fctukSj esa tekur ij eqDr djus gsrq izLrqr fd;k x;k gSA

¶6

vkosnd ds fo}ku vf/koDrk ,oa fo}ku vij 'kkldh; vf/koDrk dks lquk rFkk i=koyh dk ifj’khyu fd;kA

¶7

vkosnd ds fo}ku vf/koDrk us rdZ izLrqr fd;k fd vkosnd dks bl izdj.k esa xyr ,oa QthZ rjhds ls >wBk QWlk;k x;k gS] mlus dfFkr vijk/k dkfjr ugha fd;k gS] vkosnd dks xkao ds pquko dh ikVhZcUnh ds dkj.k >wBk QWlk;k x;k gS] ?kVuk dh izkFkfedh foyEc ls fy[kk;h x;h gS ftldk dksbZ Li"Vhdj.k ugha fn;k x;k gS] vkosnd orZeku xzke iz/kku dk lg;ksxh gS] tcfd okfnuh vU; izR;k’kh dh lg;ksxh gS] bl dkj.k mls QthZ QWlk;k x;k gS] vkosnd funksZ"k gS rFkk og bl izdj.k esa fn0 11&12&2022 ls dkjkxkj es a fu:) gS] blfy, vkosnd dks tekur ij NksM+ fn;k tk;A

¶8

fo}ku vij 'kkldh; vf/koDrk us vkosnd ds tekur dk izcy fojks/k djrs gq, rdZ izLrqr fd;k fd vkosnd }kjk okfnuh ds ?kj esa ?kqldj okfnuh dh vo;Ld iq=h ds lkFk tcjnLrh cykRdkj djus dk iz;kl fd;k x;k rFkk okfnuh ,oa mldh iq=h dks xkyh xykSt dj tku ls ekjus dh /kedh nh x;h] ihfM+rk ds /kkjk 161 ,oa 164 na0iz0la0 ds c;ku ls vfHk;kstu dFkkud dk leFkZu gksrk gS] yksxksa }kjk bl ekeys esa i{kdkjksa ds e/; le>kSrk djkus ds ckotwn Hkh vkosnd }kjk ?kVuk dh iqujkofRr dh x;h] vkosnd@vfHk;qDr }kjk dkfjr vijk/k laKs; ,oa xEHkhj izdfr dk gS] blfy, vkosnd dks tekur ij u NksM+k tk;A

¶9

fo}ku vij 'kkldh; vf/koDrk ds rdksZ ds ifjisz{; esa i=koyh ij miyC/k lk{;ksa ds vk/kkj ij vkosnd dks tekur ij eqDr fd, tkus dk dksbZ vkSfpR; ugha gS rFkk ;g tekur vkosnu i= fujLr fd, tkus ;ksX; gSA

¶10

rn~uqlkj okn ds xq.k nks"k ij fcuk dksbZ fVIi.kh fd, gq,] vkosnd dk tekur vkosnu i= fujLr fd;k tkrk gSA

¶11

lacaf/kr fopkj.k U;k;ky; dks funsZf’kr fd;k tkrk gS fd bl ekeys ls lacaf/kr l= ijh{k.k dk fuLrkj.k 'kh/kzrk ds vk/kkj ij djuk lqfuf’pr fd;k tk;A fn0 % 22&3&2023 ds0lh0flag

¶12

Digitally signed by :- KAILASH CHANDRA SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

Salman v. State of U.P. and 3 Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Salman v. State of U.P. and 3 Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Radhyshyam Bharti Vs State of U.P. and Another

Irfan Vs State of U.P.

Sabuddin Vs State of U.P.

Kripa Shankar Shukla Vs State of U.P. and Another

Anil Kumar Vs State of U.P.

Kailash Kushwaha Vs State of U.P. and 3 Others