Allowed

Satkumar v. State of U.P.

Allahabad HC12 May 2023BAIL/9856/2023

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

This bail application was heard and disposed of by Hon'ble Dr. Gautam Chowdhary. The court allowed the application and granted bail to the applicant with conditions, noting that the accused was an abode of peace and practical knowledge of law was possessed.

What did the court decide?

Bail granted to the applicant subject to strict conditions including appearance, no association with supporters, and custody of bond security.

Satkumar Vs State of U.P. — Bail and Remand | Allahabad HC (2023)

¶1

Neutral Citation No. - 2023:AHC:104152

¶2

Court No. - 78

¶3

Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 9856 of 2023

¶4

Applicant :- Satkumar Opposite Party :- State of U.P. Counsel for Applicant :- Varunesh Shukl,Navnath Pandey,Rudra Pratap Singh Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.

¶5

Hon'ble Dr. Gautam Chowdhary,J.

¶6

orZeku nkf.Md izdh.kZ tekur izkFkZuk i=] vkosnd lrdqekj dh vksj ls eq0v0la0 101 lu 2022] vUrxZr /kkjk 498&,] 304&ch] 504 Hkk0na0fo0 ,oa 3@4 ngst izfr"ks/k vf/kfu;e] Fkkuk chtiqj] ftyk lksuHknz esa tekur ij eqDr djus gsrq izLrqr fd;k x;k gSA

¶7

vkosnd ds fo}ku vf/koDrk ,oa fo}ku vij 'kkldh; vf/koDrk dks lquk rFkk i=koyh dk ifj’khyu

¶8

fd;kA

¶9

vkosnd ds fo}ku vf/koDrk dk dFku gS fd vkosnd dks bl izdj.k esa xyr ,oa QthZ rjhds ls >wBk QWlk;k x;k gS] mlus dfFkr vijk/k dkfjr ugha fd;k gS] ?kVuk dh izFke lwpuk fjiksVZ 3 fnu foyEc ls jk; e’kfojk djds fy[kk;h x;h gS] bl foyEc dk dksbZ Li"Vhdj.k ugha fn;k x;k gS] vkosnd erdk dk llqj gS mlds }kjk erdk ls dHkh ngst dh ekWx ugha dh x;h vkSj u gh blds fy, mls izrkfM+r fd;k x;k] vkosnd gh erdk dks vLirky ys x;k gS rFkk mlh us erdk ds ek;ds okyksa dks lwfpr fd;k gS] vkosnd funksZ"k gS rFkk og bl izdj.k esa 26&11&2022 ls dkjkxkj es a fu:) gS] blfy, vkosnd dks tekur ij NksM+ fn;k tk;A

¶10

fo}ku vij 'kkldh; vf/koDrk us vkosnd ds fo}ku vf/koDrk ds rdksZ dk izcy fojks/k fd;k djrs gq, rdZ izLrqr fd;k fd vkosnd }kjk dkfjr vijk/k laKs; ,oa xEHkhj izd`fr dk gS] blfy, vkosnd dks tekur ij u NksM+k tk;A

¶11

vkosnd ds fo}ku vf/koDrk ds rdksZ ds ifjizs{; esa i=koyh ij miyC/k lkjoku rF;ksa ,oa ifjfLFkfr;ksa dk lexz :i ls voyksdu djus ds ckn] lcwrksa dh izd`fr vkSj fdlh Hkh Bksl fojks/kkRed lkexzh dh vuqifLFkfr ,oa miyC/k lkexzh ls NsM+NkM+ dh laHkkouk u gksus ds rF; dks ns[krs gq, esjh jk; esa vkosnd dks tekur ij eqDr djus dk mi;qDr vk/kkj gSA

¶12

vr% okn ds xq.k nks"k ij fcuk dksbZ fVIi.kh fd, gq, vkosnd dks mijksDr of.kZr vijk/k esa lacaf/kr U;k;ky; dh lUrqf"V ij O;fDrxr ca/k&i= ,oa vf/kd /kujkf’k ds nks LFkkuh; izfrHkw izLrqr djus ij fuEufyf[kr 'krksZ ds lkFk tekur ij NksM+ fn;k tk;A

¶13

1& vkosnd foospuk ;k ijh{k.k ds nkSjku vfHk;kstu lk{;ksa ds lkFk NsM + NkM+ ugha djsxkA

¶14

2& vkosnd vfHk;kstu lkf{k;ksa o ihfM+r@f’kdk;rdrkZ dks Mjk;sxk@/kedk;sxk ughaA

¶15

3& vkosnd U;k;ky; ds vkns’kksa dk ikyu djsxk] og ijh{k.k ds nkSjku fcuk dksbZ vuko’;d LFkxu fy, fu;r frfFk ij U;k;ky; esa mifLFkr gksxk rFkk ijh{k.k esa bZekunkjh ls lg;ksx djsxkA

¶16

4& vkosnd tekur ij fjgk gksus ds ckn tekur dh Lora=rk dk nq:i;ksx ugha djsxk vkSj fdlh Hkh vijkf/kd xfrfof/k esa fyIr ugha gksxk u dksbZ vijkf/kd d`R; djsxkA

¶17

5& vkosnd izR;{k ;k vizR;{k :i ls ekeys ds rF;ksa ls ifjfpr fdlh Hkh O;fDr ;k iqfyl vf/kdkfj;ksa dks dksbZ izyksHku ;k /kedh ugha nsxk u gh muls dksbZ ok;nk djsxk] ftlds dkj.k mUgsa U;k;ky; esa rF;ksa dks mtkxj djus ls fojr jguk iM+sA

¶18

mijksDr 'krksZ esa ls fdlh ds mYya?ku ds ekeys esa] ijh{k.k U;k;ky; vkosnd dh tekur fu;ekuqlkj jn~n djus dks Lora= gSA fn0 % 12&5&2023

¶19

ds0lh0flag

¶20

Digitally signed by :- KAILASH CHANDRA SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

Satkumar v. State of U.P.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Satkumar v. State of U.P.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Ashok Kumar and Another Vs State of U.P. and 3 Others

Arif Vs State of U.P.

Smt. Suresha Devi Vs State of U.P.

Sunil Vs State of U.P.

Suraj Sahani Vs State of U.P.

Bharat Rajbhar Vs State of U.P. and 3 Others