Dismissed

Smt. Suresha Devi v. State of U.P.

Allahabad HC11 May 2023BAIL/1286/2023

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

In an application for bail under Section 439(3) CrPC, the applicant charged with offences under Sections 498, 323, 316 IPC, and Sections 304 Ch and Section 4 Roads Act, 1911 was released on bail after the court recorded dissatisfaction with the settler's evidence and her absence, considering the nature of offences and her health condition.

What did the court decide?

Bail granted to the applicant subject to specific conditions including appearance before the court and no interference with evidence.

Smt. Suresha Devi Vs State of U.P. — Domestic Violence | Allahabad HC (2023)

¶1

Neutral Citation No. - 2023:AHC:102733

¶2

Court No. - 78

¶3

Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 1286 of 2023

¶4

Applicant :- Smt. Suresha Devi Opposite Party :- State of U.P. Counsel for Applicant :- Shailendra Kumar Singh,Vinay Kumar Tripathi Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.

¶5

Hon'ble Dr. Gautam Chowdhary,J.

¶6

orZeku nkf.Md izdh.kZ tekur izkFkZuk i=] vkosfndk Jherh lqjs’kk nsoh dh vksj ls eq0v0la0 191 lu 2022] vUrxZr /kkjk 304&ch] 498&,] 323] 316 Hkk0na0fo0 ,oa 3@4 ngst izfr"ks/k vf/kfu;e] Fkkuk ehjtkiqj] ftyk 'kkgtgkWiqj esa tekur ij eqDr djus gsrq izLrqr fd;k x;k gSA

¶7

vkosfndk ds fo}ku vf/koDrk ,oa fo}ku vij 'kkldh; vf/koDrk dks lquk rFkk i=koyh dk ifj’khyu fd;kA

¶8

vkosfndk ds fo}ku vf/koDrk dk dFku gS fd vkosfndk dks bl izdj.k esa xyr ,oa QthZ rjhds ls >wBk QWlk;k x;k gS] mlus dfFkr vijk/k dkfjr ugha fd;k gS] izFke lwpuk fjiksVZ] 'ko ijh{k.k vk[;k ,oa miyC/k lk{; ijLij fojks/kkHkk"kh gSa] vkosfndk erdk o mlds ifr ls vyx jgrh Fkh rFkk og [ksrksa esa jgdj [ksrksa dh j[kokyh djrh Fkh] vkosfndk us erdk o mlds ek;ds okyksa ls dHkh ngst dh ekWx ugha fd;k vkSj u gh blds fy, mls izrkfM+r fd;k] D;ksafd blls vkosfndk dks dksbZ ykHk gksus okyk ugha Fkk] e`rdk us Lo;a vkRegR;k fd;k gS] vkosfndk funksZ"k gS rFkk og bl izdj.k esa 27&7&2022 ls dkjkxkj es a fu:) gS blfy, vkosfndk dks tekur ij NksM+ fn;k tk;A

¶9

fo}ku vij 'kkldh; vf/koDrk us vkosfndk ds fo}ku vf/koDrk ds rdksZ dk izcy fojks/k djrs gq, rdZ izLrqr fd;k fd vkosfndk }kjk dkfjr vijk/k laKs; ,oa xEHkhj izd`fr dk gS] blfy, vkosfndk dks tekur ij u NksM+k tk;A

¶10

vkosfndk ds fo}ku vf/koDrk ds rdksZ ds ifjizs{; esa i=koyh ij miyC/k lkjoku rF;ksa ,oa ifjfLFkfr;ksa dk lexz :i ls voyksdu djus ds ckn] lcwrksa dh izd`fr vkSj fdlh Hkh Bksl fojks/kkRed lkexzh dh vuqifLFkfr ,oa miyC/k lkexzh ls NsM+NkM+ dh laHkkouk u gksus ds rF; dks ns[krs gq, esjh jk; esa vkosfndk dks tekur ij eqDr djus dk mi;qDr vk/kkj gSA

¶11

vr% okn ds xq.k nks"k ij fcuk dksbZ fVIi.kh fd, gq, vkosfndk dks mijksDr of.kZr vijk/k esa lacaf/kr U;k;ky; dh lUrqf"V ij O;fDrxr ca/k&i= ,oa vf/kd /kujkf’k ds nks LFkkuh; izfrHkw izLrqr djus ij fuEufyf[kr 'krksZ ds lkFk tekur ij NksM+ fn;k tk;A

¶12

1& vkosfndk foospuk ;k ijh{k.k ds nkSjku vfHk;kstu lk{;ksa ds lkFk NsM + NkM+ ugha djsxhA 2& vkosfndk vfHk;kstu lkf{k;ksa o ihfM+r@f’kdk;rdrkZ dks Mjk;sxh@/kedk;sxh ughaA

¶13

3& vkosfndk U;k;ky; ds vkns’kksa dk ikyu djsxh] og ijh{k.k ds nkSjku fcuk dksbZ vuko’;d LFkxu fy, fu;r frfFk ij U;k;ky; esa mifLFkr gksxh rFkk ijh{k.k esa bZekunkjh ls lg;ksx djsxhA

¶14

4& vkosfndk tekur ij fjgk gksus ds ckn tekur dh Lora=rk dk nq:i;ksx ugha djsxh vkSj fdlh Hkh vijkf/kd xfrfof/k esa fyIr ugha gksxh u dksbZ vijkf/kd d`R; djsxhA

¶15

5& vkosfndk izR;{k ;k vizR;{k :i ls ekeys ds rF;ksa ls ifjfpr fdlh Hkh O;fDr ;k iqfyl vf/kdkfj;ksa dks dksbZ izyksHku ;k /kedh ugha nsxh u gh muls dksbZ ok;nk djsxh] ftlds dkj.k mUgsa U;k;ky; esa rF;ksa dks mtkxj djus ls fojr jguk iM+sA

¶16

mijksDr 'krksZ esa ls fdlh ds mYya?ku ds ekeys esa] ijh{k.k U;k;ky; vkosfndk dh tekur fu;ekuqlkj jn~n djus dks Lora= gSA

¶17

fn0 % 11&5&2023

¶18

ds0lh0flag

¶19

Digitally signed by :- KAILASH CHANDRA SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

Smt. Suresha Devi v. State of U.P.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Smt. Suresha Devi v. State of U.P.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Pushpendra Singh Vs State of U.P.

Ramakant Nishad Vs State of U.P.

Jitendra Kumar Vs State of U.P. and 3 Others

Ashok Kumar and Another Vs State of U.P. and 3 Others

Arif Vs State of U.P.

Ritik Vs State of U.P. and 3 Others