Chaman Prakash Vs State of U.P.

Neutral Citation No. - 2023:AHC:159478

Court No. - 68

Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 6792 of 2021

Applicant :- Chaman Prakash Opposite Party :- State of U.P. Counsel for Applicant :- Piyush Shukla,Mohd. Samiuzzaman Khan Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.

¶5

Hon'ble Dr. Gautam Chowdhary,J.

¶6

Heard learned counsel for the applicant, learned counsel for the State and perused the material on record.

¶7

The Crl. Misc. First Bail Application No. 14167 of 2019 of the applicant has been rejected by another bench of this court vide order dated 15.04.2019.

¶8

This is second bail application under Section 439 of Code of Criminal Procedure has been filed by the applicant Chaman Prakash, seeking enlargement on bail during trial in connection with Case Crime No. 828 of 2018, under sections 302, 201, 364, 120-B, 34 IPC, P.S. Chakeri, District Kanpur Nagar.

¶9

The submission advanced by learned counsel for the applicant is that the applicant is innocent and has been falsely implicated in the present case due to ulterior motive. The applicant is not named in the first information report. During investigation the applicant and co-accused Jagdamba Singh @ Krishna Wadwani have been arrested as they have confessed before the police for committing the alleged offence. The case of the applicant is based on the same footing with the case of co-accused Jagdamba Singh @ Krishna Wadwani who has been released on bail by another bench of this court in Crl. Misc. Bail Application No. 13297 of 2020 vide order dated 23.07.2020. Several other submissions in order to demonstrate the falsity of the allegations made against the applicant have also been placed before the Court. The circumstances which, according to the counsel, led to the false implication of the accused have also been mentioned. It has also been assured on behalf of the applicant that he is ready to cooperate with the process of law and shall faithfully make himself available before the court whenever required and is also ready to accept all the conditions which the Court may deem fit to impose upon him. It is further contended by learned counsel for the applicant that the applicant is languishing in jail since 19.07.2018 having no criminal history.

¶10

Per contra, learned AGA for the State has opposed the prayer for bail but admitted the fact that the named co-accused has already been released on bail.

¶11

After perusing the record in the light of the submissions made at the bar and after taking an overall view of all the facts and circumstances of this case, the nature of evidence and also the absence of any convincing material to indicate the possibility of tampering with the evidence, this Court is of the view that the applicant may be enlarged on bail.

¶12

Let the applicant- Chaman Prakash, be released on bail in the aforesaid case crime number on furnishing a personal bond and two heavy sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of the court concerned with the following conditions which are being imposed in the interest of justice:-

¶13

i) The applicant will not tamper with prosecution evidence and will not harm or harass the victim/complainant in any manner whatsoever.

¶14

ii) The applicant will abide the orders of court, will attend the court on every date and will not delay the disposal of trial in any manner whatsoever.

¶15

(iii) The applicant shall file an undertaking to the effect that he shall not seek any adjournment on the date fixed for evidence when the witnesses are present in court. In case of default of this condition, it shall be open for the trial court to treat it as abuse of liberty of bail and pass orders in accordance with law.

¶16

(iv) The applicant will not misuse the liberty of bail in any manner whatsoever. In case, the applicant misuses the liberty of bail during trial and in order to secure his presence proclamation under section 82 Cr.P.C., may be issued and if applicant fails to appear before the court on the date fixed in such proclamation, then, the trial court shall initiate proceedings against him, in accordance with law, under section 174-A I.P.C.

¶17

(V) The applicant shall remain present, in person, before the trial court on dates fixed for (1) opening of the case, (2) framing of charge and (3) recording of statement under Section 313 Cr.P.C. If in the opinion of the trial court absence of the applicant is deliberate or without sufficient cause, then it shall be open for the trial court to treat such default as abuse of liberty of bail and proceed against him in accordance with law and the trial court may

¶18

proceed against him under Section 229-A IPC.

¶19

(vi) The trial court may make all possible efforts/endeavour and try to conclude the trial expeditiously after the release of the applicant.

¶20

The identity, status and residential proof of sureties will be verified by court concerned and in case of breach of any of the conditions mentioned above, court concerned will be at liberty to cancel the bail and send the applicant to prison.

¶21

The bail application is allowed .

¶22

Order Date :- 8.8.2023

¶23

RPD

¶24

Digitally signed by :- RATAN PRAKASH DWIVEDI High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

Chaman Prakash v. State of U.P.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Chaman Prakash v. State of U.P.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Why is it important?

What the court decided

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Procedural history

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Smt Soniya Vs State of U.P.

Jasmanti @ Jasmant Kumari Vs State of U.P.

Bechai Chaudhari and Another Vs State of U.P.

Sanjay Singh @ Mochi Singh Vs State of U.P and 3 Others

Maskin Vs State of U.P.

Shadik Khan @ Sameer Vs State of U.P. and 3 Others