Allowed

Satish Verma v. State of U.P.

Allahabad HC30 Jan 2023BAIL/58449/2022

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

In Criminal Misc. Bail Application No. 58449 of 2022, the Allahabad High Court allowed the bail application of Satish Verma, who was charged with offenses under Sections 323, 325, 326, 504, and 506 IPC, directing his release on a personal bond and two sureties subject to specific conditions.

What did the court decide?

Release of Satish Verma on bail by furnishing a personal bond and two sureties.

Satish Verma Vs State of U.P. — Cheating and Forgery | Allahabad HC (2023)

¶1

Court No. - 78

¶2

Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 58449 of 2022

¶3

Applicant :- Satish Verma Opposite Party :- State of U.P. Counsel for Applicant :- Ganesh Shankar Patel Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.

¶4

Hon'ble Deepak Verma,J.

¶5

Heard learned counsel for the applicant, learned A.G.A. for the State and perused the record.

¶6

The instant bail application has been filed with a prayer to release the applicant on bail in Case Crime No. 562 of 2022, registered under Sections 323, 325, 326, 504, 506 IPC, Police Station Civil Lines, District Budaun during pendency of the trial.

¶7

It is alleged in the FIR that accused persons badly beated and assaulted the informant's father. It is argued by learned counsel for the applicant submitted that the applicant is innocent and has been falsely implicated in the present case. General role has been assigned. Co-accused person Virendra Verma alias Veeru has been granted bail by this Hon'ble Court. The applicant has no previous criminal history. The applicant claims parity with the co-accused. The applicant is languishing in jail since 16.09.2022. In case, the applicant is released on bail, he will not misuse the liberty of bail and co-operate in trial.

¶8

Per contra, learned A.G.A. has opposed the bail prayer of the applicant but could not dispute the aforesaid aspects of the matter.

¶9

Considering the entire facts and circumstances of the case, submissions of learned counsel for the parties and keeping in view the nature of offence, evidence, complicity of accused and without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case and the law laid down by the Apex Court in Satendra Kumar Antil Vs. C.B.I. & Another , S.L.P. (Crl.) No. 5191 of 2021 , the Court is of the view that the applicant has made out a case for bail. The bail application is allowed.

¶10

Let the applicant, Satish Verma, who is involved in the aforesaid case crime, be released on bail on his furnishing a personal bond and two sureties each in the like amount

¶11

to the satisfaction of the court concerned subject to following conditions. Further, before issuing the release order, the sureties be verified.

¶12

The applicant shall not tamper with the prosecution evidence by intimidating/ pressurizing the witnesses, during the investigation or trial.

¶13

The applicant shall cooperate in the trial sincerely without seeking any adjournment.

¶14

The applicant shall not indulge in any criminal activity or commission of any crime after being released on bail.

¶15

In case of breach of any of the above conditions, it shall be a ground for cancellation of bail.

¶16

Order Date :- 30.1.2023 Rama Kant

¶17

Digitally signed by :- RAMAKANT High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

Satish Verma v. State of U.P.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Satish Verma v. State of U.P.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Cases cited

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Chandni and Another Vs State of U P and 4 Others

Ankit Agarwal Vs State of U.P.

Yogendra Kumar Tiwari Vs State of U.P.

Abhishek Vs State of U.P.

Mohd. Zeeshan Vs State of U.P.

Dharampal Vs State of U.P.