Allowed

Rahul Singh v. State of U.P.

Allahabad HC22 Mar 2023BAIL/58010/2022

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court of Judicature at Allahabad, through a single judge, allowed a criminal bail application. The court concluded that the applicant, Rahul Singh, was entitled to bail based on reasonable apprehension of witness tampering and prima facie satisfaction of the charge, despite the severity of the accusations involving cheating and forgery.

What did the court decide?

The applicant Ayushi Agrawal involved in Case Crime No.17 of 2022 be released on bail upon furnishing a personal bond with two heavy sureties of Rs.2 Lacs each.

Rahul Singh Vs State of U.P. — Cheque Dishonour | Allahabad HC (2023)

¶1

Court No. - 86 Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 58010 of 2022

¶2

Applicant :- Rahul Singh Opposite Party :- State of U.P. Counsel for Applicant :- Reena Pal,Adarsh Srivastava Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.

¶3

Hon'ble Vivek Kumar Singh,J.

¶4

Heard learned counsel for the applicant and learned A.G.A. appearing for the State.

¶5

It has been contended by the learned counsel for the applicant that the applicant has been falsely implicated in the present case due to ulterior motive. It is next contended that the co-accused Sandeep has been granted bail by co-ordinate Bench of this Court vide order dated 12.09.2022 in Criminal Misc. Bail Application No.30328 of 2022, therefore, the applicant is also entitled for bail on the ground of parity. Several other submissions in order to demonstrate the falsity of the allegations made against the applicant have also been placed forth before the Court. The circumstances which, according to the counsel, led to the false implication of the accused has also been touched upon at length. It has been assured on behalf of the applicant that he is ready to cooperate with the process of law and shall faithfully make himself available before the court whenever required. It has also been submitted that the applicant is languishing in jail since 22.05.2022. It has been pointed out that there is no previous criminal history of the applicant.

¶6

Learned A.G.A. opposed the prayer for bail.

¶7

Considering the nature of accusation and the severity of punishment in case of conviction and the nature of supporting evidence, reasonable apprehension of tempering of the witnesses and prima facie satisfaction of the Court in support of the charge and reformative theory of punishment the applicant is entitled to be released on bail in this case.

¶8

Let the applicant Ayushi Agrawal involved in Case Crime No.17 of 2022, under Sections 406, 419, 420, 467, 468, 471, 472, 120-B, 201 and 34 I.P.C. and 66-D of Information and Technology Act, Police Station Cyber Crime, District Agra be released on bail on his furnishing a personal bond with two

¶9

heavy sureties of Rs.2 Lacs each one should be of family members in the like amount to the satisfaction of the court concerned with the following conditions.

¶10

(i) The applicant shall file an undertaking to the effect that he shall not seek any adjournment on the dates fixed for evidence when the witnesses are present in court. In case of default of this condition, it shall be open for the trial court to treat it as abuse of liberty of bail and pass orders in accordance with law.

¶11

(ii) The applicant shall remain present before the trial court on each date fixed, either personally or through his counsel. In case of his absence, without sufficient cause, the trial court may proceed against him under Section 229-A of the Indian Penal Code.

¶12

(iii) In case, the applicant misuses the liberty of bail during trial and in order to secure his presence proclamation under Section 82 Cr.P.C. is issued and the applicant fails to appear before the court on the date fixed in such proclamation, then, the trial court shall initiate proceedings against him, in accordance with law, under Section 174-A of the Indian Penal Code.

¶13

(iv) The applicant shall remain present, in person, before the trial court on the dates fixed for (i) opening of the case, (ii) framing of charge and (iii) recording of statement under Section 313 Cr.P.C. If in the opinion of the trial court absence of the applicant is deliberate or without sufficient cause, then it shall be open for the trial court to treat such default as abuse of liberty of bail and proceed against him in accordance with law.

¶14

In case of breach of any of the above conditions, the trial court will be at liberty to cancel the bail.

¶15

It is clarified that the observations, if any, made in this order are strictly confined to the disposal of this bail application and must not be construed to have any reflection on the ultimate merits of the case.

¶16

The trial court is directed to expedite the trial of the present case and conclude the same expeditiously preferably within a period of six months from the date of production of a certified copy of this order, if there is no legal impediment.

¶17

Order Date :- 22.3.2023 Jitendra

¶18

Digitally signed by :- JITENDRA KUMAR PATEL High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

Rahul Singh v. State of U.P.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Rahul Singh v. State of U.P.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Sunny Deol @ Chandrasen Vs State of U.P.

Treta Dev Vs N.C.B.

Ankit @ Devendra Vs State of U.P.

Ayushi Agrawal Vs State of U.P.

Vishal Pathak Vs State of U.P.

Abhay Jadaun Vs State of U.P.