Allowed

Sunny Deol @ Chandrasen v. State of U.P.

Allahabad HC21 Mar 2023BAIL/7717/2023

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The court granted bail to the applicant in a case under the U.P. Gangsters and Anti Social Activities (Prevention) Act. The order is subject to strict conditions regarding court appearances, compliance with evidence dates, and presence during specific stages of the trial, with penalties for violation.

What did the court decide?

Enlargement on bail by executing a personal bond and furnishing two sureties, subject to four specific conditions regarding court attendance.

Sunny Deol @ Chandrasen Vs State of U.P. — Bail and Remand | Allahabad HC (2023)

¶1

Court No. - 86

¶2

Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 7717 of 2023

¶3

Applicant :- Sunny Deol @ Chandrasen Opposite Party :- State of U.P. Counsel for Applicant :- Arun Kumar Vishvakarma Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.

¶4

Hon'ble Vivek Kumar Singh,J.

¶5

Heard Sri Arun Kumar Vishvakarma, learned counsel for the applicant and Sri Mithlesh Kumar, learned A.G.A. for the State.

¶6

It has been contended by the learned counsel for the applicant that only two cases have been shown against the applicant in the Gang Chart which has been annexed at page-27 of the bail application and in the said case, the applicant has been granted bail by the competent Court. The applicant is in jail since 29.5.2021.

¶7

Learned A.G.A. opposed the prayer for bail.

¶8

Keeping in view the nature of submissions advanced and the provisions of Section 19 of the U.P. Gangsters and Anti Social Activities (Prevention) Act, let the applicant- Sunny Deol @ Chandrasen involved in Case Crime No.26 of 2022, under Section 2/3 U.P. Gangsters and Anti Social Activities (Prevention) Act, Police Station-Etmaddaula, District Agra be enlarged on bail on his executing a personal bond and furnishing two sureties, each in the like amount to the satisfaction of the court concerned subject to the following condition:-

¶9

(i) The applicant shall file an undertaking to the effect that he shall not seek any adjournment on the dates fixed for evidence when the witnesses are present in court. In case of default of this condition, it shall be open for the trial court to treat it as abuse of liberty of bail and pass orders in accordance with law.

¶10

(ii) The applicant shall remain present before the trial court on each date fixed, either personally or through his counsel. In case of his absence, without sufficient cause, the trial court may proceed against him under Section 229-A of the Indian Penal Code.

¶11

(iii) In case, the applicant misuses the liberty of bail during trial and in order to secure his presence proclamation under Section 82 Cr.P.C. is issued and the applicant fails to appear before the court on the date fixed in such proclamation, then, the trial court shall initiate proceedings against him, in accordance with law, under Section 174-A of the Indian Penal Code.

¶12

(iv) The applicant shall remain present, in person, before the trial court on the dates fixed for (i) opening of the case, (ii) framing of charge and (iii) recording of statement under Section 313 Cr.P.C. If in the opinion

¶13

of the trial court absence of the applicant is deliberate or without sufficient cause, then it shall be open for the trial court to treat such default as abuse of liberty of bail and proceed against him in accordance with law.

¶14

Order Date :- 21.3.2023 Dev/-

¶15

Digitally signed by :- DEV PRAKASH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

Sunny Deol @ Chandrasen v. State of U.P.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Sunny Deol @ Chandrasen v. State of U.P.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Lakshiram Yadav Vs State of U.P.

Kakey Vs State of U.P.

Waseem Vs State of U.P.

Treta Dev Vs N.C.B.

Ankit @ Devendra Vs State of U.P.

Ajay Kumar Vs State of U.P.