It has been contended by the learned counsel for the applicant that the applicant has been falsely implicated in the present case due to ulterior motive. It is next contended that as per F.I.R. version, complainant was subjected to cruelty by her husband, in-laws for which present F.I.R. had been lodged. It is further submitted that matter was referred to conciliation centre on 26.10.2020 at 9:00 P.M.. Husband of the complainant and her in-laws came to her paternal home and tried to forcibly take her along with them to their home and when she refused, they had assaulted her. It is further submitted that in F.I.R. it is stated that applicant, who is husband of the victim, had assaulted her by a rod, however, in injury report, victim has received four injuries on her person, however, the same was found to be simple in nature by doctor and caused by hard and blunt object. Coaccused have already been granted bail by the court below. It has also been submitted that the applicant is languishing in jail since 20.10.2022. It is submitted that there is no apprehension of the applicant influencing the witness, tampering the evidence or fleeing from judicial process. In case he is released on bail, he undertakes to abide by all the conditions and not to misuse the liberty of bail.
