Learned counsel for the revisionist has submitted that the revisionist was declared juvenile vide order dated 23.12.2021 passed by the Juvenile Justice Board, Gautam Buddha Nagar; according to which, his age is mentioned around 17 years in social assessment report filed by District Probation Officer, in which, it is also stated that in the family of revisionist, one brother, two sisters, his mother, who is housewife and father, who is retail seller of slipper are there; he is studying and passed out of class 8th; revisionist is not named in the FIR; his name surfaced in the statement of Kamalu, who is named in the FIR alongwith co-accused Mobin; even in the statement of coaccused, role assigned to revisionist is of catching hold of the deceased at the time of incident; co-accused Mobin, who is named in the FIR, is already released on bail vide order dated 29.9.2022 passed by co-ordinate Bench of this Court in Criminal Misc. Bail Application no. 24490 of 2022; FIR in the present case was lodged after recovery of dead body of the deceased, who got missing since 5.7.2021; applicant has been falsely implicated in this case; he has not been assigned any criminal history; case is based on circumstantial evidence and mainly on the basis of confessional statement of co-accused before the police he has been implicated in this case; he has not committed any offence.
