Bail application dismissed as infructuous because the applicant had already been convicted by the trial court during the pendency of the bail application.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 75
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 57616 of 2022
Applicant :- Ankit Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. And 3 Others Counsel for Applicant :- Pradip Kumar Shukla Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.
Hon'ble Sanjay Kumar Singh,J.
The instant bail application under Section 439 of Cr.P.C. has been filed on behalf of the applicant with a prayer to release him on bail in Case Crime No. 497 of 2014, under Sections 363, 366, 376 I.P.C. and Section 4 of POCSO Act, Police Station-Kaimganj, District-Farrukhabad, during the pendency of trial.
At the outset, Mr. Pradip Kumar Shukla, learned counsel for the applicant submits that during the pendency of this bail application, the trial of the applicant has been concluded and applicant-Ankit convicted by the concerned court below, therefore, the instant bail application has lost its efÏcacy.
In view of the statement made by learned counsel for the applicant at the Bar, the instant bail application is dismissed as infructuous.
Order Date :- 17.4.2023 Saurabh
Digitally signed by :- SAURABH KUMAR High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Ankit
Sanjay Kumar Singh
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
