Allowed

Vimal v. State of U.P and 3 Others

Allahabad HC28 Feb 2023BAIL/56051/2022

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court granted bail to an under-trial accused facing charges of rape and penetrative sexual assault, citing delay in trial and jail overcrowding. The order imposed strict conditions regarding court appearance and witness tampering, directing expedited trial completion.

What did the court decide?

Release on bail with personal bond and two sureties on strict conditions; trial concluded within one year.

Vimal Vs State of U.P and 3 Others — Anticipatory Bail | Allahabad HC (2023)

¶1

Court No. - 73

¶2

Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 56051 of 2022

¶3

Applicant :- Vimal Opposite Party :- State Of U.P And 3 Others Counsel for Applicant :- Ram Badan Maurya Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.,Dhirendra Kumar Verma

¶4

Hon'ble Siddharth,J.

¶5

List revised.

¶6

Despite telephonic information given to the learned counsel for informant by the learned counsel for the applicant, no one appears.

¶7

Heard Shri R.B. Maurya, and learned counsel for the applicant as well as the learned AGA for the State and perused the material placed on record.

¶8

The instant bail application has been filed on behalf of the applicant, Vimal, with a prayer to release him on bail in Case Crime No. 113 of 2022, under Sections 363, 366, 376 IPC and 3/4 POCSO Act, Police Station Mangalpur, District- District, during pendency of trial.

¶9

There is allegation against the applicant of abduction of minor girl, commission of offence of rape and penetrative sexual assault.

¶10

Learned counsel for the applicant has submitted that the victim has been examined before the trial court and she has not supported the prosecution case and has been declared hostile. The applicant has been falsely implicated in this case. He has no criminal history to his credit and is languishing in jail since 16.08.2022. The trial in the aforesaid case is not likely to be concluded in near future.

¶11

Per contra learned A.G.A. has opposed the prayer for bail of the applicant by contending that the innocence of the applicant cannot be adjudged at pre trial stage, therefore, he does not deserves any indulgence. In case the applicant is released on bail he will again indulge in similar activities and will misuse the liberty of bail.

¶12

Having considered the submissions of the parties noted above, finding force in the submissions made by the learned counsel for the applicant, keeping in view the uncertainty regarding conclusion

¶13

of trial; one sided investigation by police, ignoring the case of accused side; applicant being under-trial having fundamental right to speedy trial; larger mandate of the Article 21 of the Constitution of India, considering the dictum of Apex Court in the case of Satendra Kumar Antil Vs. C.B.I. & Another, passed in S.L.P. (Crl.) No. 5191 of 2021, judgement dated 11.7.2022 and considering 5-6 times overcrowding in jails over and above their capacity by under trials and without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, let the applicant involved in the aforesaid crime be released on bail on his furnishing a personal bond and two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of the court concerned with the following conditions that :-

¶14

(i) The applicant shall not tamper with the evidence or threaten the witnesses.

¶15

(ii) The applicant shall file an undertaking to the effect that he shall not seek any adjournment on the dates fixed for evidence when the witnesses are present in Court. In case of default of this condition, it shall be open for the Trial Court to treat it as abuse of liberty of bail and pass orders in accordance with law.

¶16

(iii) The applicant shall remain present before the Trial Court on each date fixed, either personally or as directed by the Court. In case of his absence, without sufficient cause, the Trial Court may proceed against him under Section 229-A of the Indian Penal Code.

¶17

(iv) In case the applicant misuse the liberty of bail during trial and in order to secure his presence, proclamation under Section 82 Cr.P.C. is issued and the applicants fail to appear before the Court on the date fixed in such proclamation then the Trial Court shall initiate proceedings against him in accordance with law under Section 174-A of the Indian Penal Code.

¶18

(v) The applicant shall remain present in person before the Trial Court on the dates fixed for (i) opening of the case, (ii) framing of charge and (iii) recording of statement under Section 313 Cr.P.C. If in the opinion of the Trial Court absence of the applicant is deliberate or without sufficient cause, then it shall be open for the Trial Court to treat such default as abuse of liberty of bail and proceed against him in accordance with law.

¶19

In case, of breach of any of the above conditions, it shall be a ground for cancellation of bail.

¶20

Identity and residence proof of the applicant and sureties be verified by the court concerned before the bonds are accepted.

¶21

The court below is directed to conclude the trial against the applicant, as expeditiously as possible, preferably within a period of one year from the date of production of certified copy of this order.

¶22

Order Date :- 28.2.2023

¶23

Abhishek

¶24

Digitally signed by :- ABHISHEK YADAV High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

Vimal v. State of U.P and 3 Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Vimal v. State of U.P and 3 Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Cases cited

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Alam Vs State of U.P.

Sonveer Vs State of U.P.

Siddhu Yadav Vs State of U.P.

Rohit and Another Vs State of U.P.

Ravindra Rana @ Tinku @ Pahalwan Vs State of U.P.

Vikas Sharma @ Vikki Sharma Vs State of U.P.