The court rejected a bail application filed by an applicant accused of murder under Section 302 IPC. The court found the case lacked merits and denied bail, directing the trial court to decide the case within one year to address the applicant's prolonged detention.
Bail application rejected; trial court directed to decide the case within one year.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Court No. - 79
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 5565 of 2023
Applicant :- Sandeep Sharma Opposite Party :- State of U.P. Counsel for Applicant :- Sarvesh Kumar Dubey Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.,Satendra Singh
Hon'ble Krishan Pahal,J.
after the inquest proceedings and autopsy. Learned counsel has stated that the case is of sudden provocation. The applicant has no criminal antecedents to his credit and is languishing in jail since 11.9.2022.
Order Date :- 24.3.2023 Vikas
Digitally signed by :- VIKAS VERMA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
3 issues framed by the court
Whether the applicant is fit for bail in a murder prosecution under Section 302 IPC.
Whether the bail application possesses merits given the nature of the injury and relation of parties.
Whether the trial court should decide the pending case expeditiously in view of prolonged detention.
Colour shows how this judgement treated each authority
Vinod Kumar vs. State of PunjabReferred¶2
Vinod Kumar vs. State of Punjab; 2015 (3) SCC 220 · Who else cites this
Hussain and Another vs. Union of IndiaReferred¶2
Hussain and Another vs. Union of India; (2017) 5 SCC 702 · Who else cites this
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Sandeep Sharma
State of U.P.
Krishan Pahal
Vikas Verma
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
