Disposed

Navneet and Another v. State of U.P.

Allahabad HC23 Mar 2023ABAIL/1384/2023

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

This order considers an anticipatory Bail application. The applicant withdrew the request but sought liberty to file a regular bail application. The court directed surrender within four weeks and to file a regular bail application decided under Satender Kumar Antil guidelines, granting protection from coercive action.

What did the court decide?

Direction to surrender within four weeks; liberty to file regular bail application; no coercive action for four weeks.

Navneet and Another Vs State of U.P. — Anticipatory Bail | Allahabad HC (2023)

¶1

Court No. - 79

¶2

Case :- CRIMINAL MISC ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION U/S 438 CR.P.C. No. - 1384 of 2023

¶3

Applicant :- Navneet And Another Opposite Party :- State of U.P. Counsel for Applicant :- Lakshman Singh,Jalaj Singh Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.

¶4

Hon'ble Krishan Pahal,J.

¶5

Heard Sri Lakshman Singh, learned counsel for applicants as well as Sri Rajesh Kumar Srivastava, learned A.G.A. for State and also perused the material available on record.

¶6

The present application for anticipatory bail has been filed for protection in regard to Complaint Case No. 23 of 2011, under Sections 393, 504 of I.P.C., P.S.- Nadigaon, District- Jalaun.

¶7

After arguing for some time, applicants' counsel submits that the present application for anticipatory bail may be dismissed as withdrawn with liberty to file a regular bail application which may be decided keeping in view the guidelines as laid down by the Apex Court in the case of Satender Kumar Antil vs. Central Bureau of Investigation and another , reported in 2021 SCC Online SC 922 .

¶8

Learned A.G.A. has no objection to the prayer made by the learned counsel for the applicants.

¶9

In view of the above, considering the aforesaid alternative prayer made by learned counsel for the applicants, it is directed that the applicants shall surrender before the concerned court below within a period of four weeks from today and in case, a regular bail application is filed, the same be decided in view of the law laid down by the Supreme Court in the case of Satender Kumar Antil (supra) .

¶10

For the period of four weeks from today or till the time of surrender of the applicants before the concerned court below, whichever is earlier, no coercive action shall be taken against the applicants- Navneet and Dharmendra, in the above case.

¶11

With the above observations and directions, this application is disposed of.

¶12

Order Date :- 23.3.2023 Siddhant

¶13

Digitally signed by :- SIDDHANT SAHU High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

Navneet and Another v. State of U.P.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Navneet and Another v. State of U.P.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Cases cited

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Gulshan @ Shishupal Vs State of U.P. and 3 Others

Ashutosh Vs State of U.P. Adn 3 Others

Krishna Murari and Another Vs State of U.P.

Chandan Singh Mangal Vs State of U.P. and Another

Phahimuddin Vs State of U.P. and Another

Ram Kumar Vs State of U.P.