Anticipatory bail application dismissed for want of prosecution as no one appeared on behalf of the applicant even in a revised call.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Neutral Citation No. - 2023:AHC:205975
Court No. - 73
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 53189 of 2019
Applicant :- Chetan Pandey (Minor) Opposite Party :- State of U.P. Counsel for Applicant :- Jitendra Partap Singh Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.
Hon'ble Nalin Kumar Srivastava,J.
Order Date :- 28.10.2023 Sharad/-
Digitally signed by :- SHARAD KUMAR SRIVASTAVA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
Chetan Pandey
Nalin Kumar Srivastava
Sharad Kumar Srivastava
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
