On 28.10.2023, the Allahabad High Court disposed of an anticipatory bail application. The court held that since a notice under Section 41-A Cr.P.C. was already served, there was no apprehension of arrest, making the application sub judice.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Neutral Citation No. - 2023:AHC:205567
Court No. - 73
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION U/S 438 CR.P.C. No. - 11776 of 2023
Applicant :- Hemendra @ Harvindra Opposite Party :- State of U.P. Counsel for Applicant :- Ashish Goyal Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.
Hon'ble Nalin Kumar Srivastava,J.
Order Date :- 28.10.2023 Shivangi
Digitally signed by :- SHIVANGI YADAV High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
1 issue framed by the court
Whether anticipatory bail is maintainable when notice under Section 41-A Cr.P.C. has already been served.
2 provisions across 1 enactments
Hemendra @ Harvindra
Nalin Kumar Srivastava
Shivangi Yadav
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
