Disposed

Rahul Singh v. State of U.P.

Allahabad HC21 Sept 2023ABAIL/9893/2023

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

This judgment disposes of a criminal miscellaneous anticipatory bail application. The High Court held that no case was made out for interference. It directed the applicant to surrender within four weeks and allowed the liberty to file a regular bail application governed by Supreme Court guidelines in Satender Kumar Antil.

What did the court decide?

No coercive action against the applicant for four weeks; liberty to file a regular bail application governed by Satender Kumar Antil principles.

Rahul Singh Vs State of U.P. — Anticipatory Bail | Allahabad HC (2023)

¶1

Neutral Citation No. - 2023:AHC:182614

¶2

Court No. - 72

¶3

Case :- CRIMINAL MISC ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION U/S 438 CR.P.C. No. - 9893 of 2023

¶4

Applicant :- Rahul Singh Opposite Party :- State of U.P. Counsel for Applicant :- Mahendra Bahadur Singh,Ajeet Pratap Singh,Shashank Singh Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.

¶5

Hon'ble Krishan Pahal,J.

¶6

List has been revised.

¶7

Heard Sri Mahendra Bahadur Singh, learned counsel for the applicant as well as Sri Sunil Kumar, learned A.G.A. for the State and also perused the record.

¶8

The present application for anticipatory bail has been filed for protection in regard to FIR/Case Crime No. 213 of 2013, under Sections 419, 420, 467, 468, 471 of I.P.C., P.S.- Tharwai, District- Prayagraj.

¶9

After arguing for some time, applicant's counsel submits that the present application for anticipatory bail may be disposed of with liberty to file a regular bail application which may be decided keeping in view the guidelines as laid down by the Apex Court in the case of Satender Kumar Antil vs. Central Bureau of Investigation and another , reported in 2022 SCC Online SC 825 .

¶10

Learned A.G.A. has no objection to the prayer made by the learned counsel for the applicant.

¶11

After hearing learned counsel for the parties, no case is made out for interference u/s 438 Cr.P.C.. The present anticipatory bail application is disposed of with the direction that the applicant shall surrender before the court concerned within four weeks from today and in case, a regular bail application is filed, the same be decided in view of the law laid down by the Supreme Court in the case of Satender Kumar Antil (supra) .

¶12

For the period of four weeks from today or till the time of surrender of the applicant before the court concerned, whichever is earlier, no coercive action shall be taken against the applicant, in the above case.

¶13

(Justice Krishan Pahal)

¶14

Order Date :- 21.9.2023 Siddhant

¶15

Digitally signed by :- SIDDHANT SAHU High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

Rahul Singh v. State of U.P.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Rahul Singh v. State of U.P.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Cases cited

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Bhola Nath Dhawan Vs State of U.P.

Amit Kumar Yadav @ Babu Kumar Sahab Vs State of U.P. and Another

Anil Yadav and Another Vs State of U.P. and Another

Ghaseeta Vs State of U.P. and Anothers

Shahjad @ Shahjad Khan Vs State of U.P. and Another

Krishnapal @ K.P. Vs State of U.P.