Allowed

Usha v. State of U.P.

Allahabad HC8 Dec 2023BAIL/52766/2023

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The High Court granted bail to the applicant, Usha, who was accused of outraging modesty, murder, and conspiring to murder under various IPC and BNS sections. The court noted the applicant was the wife of the deceased and held a joint family property. It imposed strict conditions on her freedom, preventing her from moving from the matrimonial home.

What did the court decide?

Granted bail with conditions to remain in matrimonial home, report to court, and not travel without permission.

Usha Vs State of U.P. — Domestic Violence | Allahabad HC (2023)

¶1

Neutral Citation No. - 2023:AHC:233208

¶2

Court No. - 68

¶3

Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 52766 of 2023

¶4

Applicant :- Usha Opposite Party :- State of U.P. Counsel for Applicant :- Abhishek Tiwari,Manoj Kumar Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.

¶5

Hon'ble Dr. Gautam Chowdhary,J.

¶6

orZeku nkf.Md izdh.kZ tekur izkFkZuk i=] vkosfndk Usha dh vksj ls eq0v0la0 46 lu 2023] vUrxZr /kkjk 365] 498&,] 302] 201] 120&ch Hkk0na0fo0] Fkkuk ukyst ikdZ] ftyk xkSrecq) uxj esa tekur ij eqDr djus gsrq izLrqr fd;k x;k gSA

¶7

vkosfndk ds fo}ku vf/koDrk ,oa fo}ku vij 'kkldh; vf/koDrk dks lquk rFkk i=koyh dk ifj’khyu fd;kA

¶8

vkosfndk ds fo}ku vf/koDrk dk dFku gS fd vkosfndk dks bl izdj.k esa xyr ,oa QthZ rjhds ls >wBk QWlk;k x;k gS] mlus dfFkr vijk/k dkfjr ugha fd;k gS] ?kVuk dh izFke lwpuk fjiksVZ 6 fnu foyEc ls ntZ djk;h x;h gS ftldk dksbZ leqfpr Li"Vhdj.k ugha fn;k x;k gS] vkosfndk us erdk ls dHkh ngst dh ekWx ugha dh vkSj u gh blds fy, mls izrkfM+r fd;k] erdk vius llqjky okyksa ls vyx vius ifr ds lkFk U;kjh esa jgrh FkhA mudk ;g Hkh dFku gS fd vkosfndk erdk dh tsBkuh gS rFkk erdk dh lkl dh tekur] tekur vkosnu i= la0 37454 lu 2023 esa bl U;k;ky; dh vU; U;k;ihB ds vkns’k fn0 20&11&2023 }kjk Lohdkj dh tk pqdh gS rFkk vkosfndk dk dsl mDr lg vfHk;qDrk ds leku gS] blfy, vkosfndk Hkh mDr lg vfHk;qDrk ls lekurk ds vk/kkj ij tekur ikus dh vf/kdkfj.kh gS] vkosfndk funksZ"k gS rFkk og bl izdj.k esa 1&4&2023 ls dkjkxkj es a fu:) gS] blfy, vkosfndk dks tekur ij NksM+ fn;k tk;A

¶9

fo}ku vij 'kkldh; vf/koDrk us vkosfndk ds fo}ku vf/koDrk ds rdksZ dk izcy fojks/k djrs gq, rdZ izLrqr fd;k fd vkosfndk }kjk dkfjr vijk/k laKs; ,oa xEHkhj izd`fr dk gS] blfy, vkosfndk dks tekur ij u NksM+k tk;A

¶10

vkosfndk ds fo}ku vf/koDrk ds rdksZ ds ifjizs{; esa i=koyh ij miyC/k lkjoku rF;ksa ,oa ifjfLFkfr;ksa dk lexz :i ls voyksdu djus ds ckn] lcwrksa dh izd`fr vkSj fdlh Hkh Bksl fojks/kkRed lkexzh dh vuqifLFkfr ,oa miyC/k lkexzh ls NsM+NkM+ dh laHkkouk u gksus ds rF; dks ns[krs gq, esjh jk; esa vkosfndk dks tekur ij eqDr djus dk mi;qDr vk/kkj gSA

¶11

vr% okn ds xq.k nks"k ij fcuk dksbZ fVIi.kh fd, gq, vkosfndk dks mijksDr of.kZr vijk/k esa lacaf/kr U;k;ky; dh lUrqf"V ij O;fDrxr ca/k&i= ,oa vf/kd /kujkf’k ds nks LFkkuh; izfrHkw izLrqr djus ij fuEufyf[kr 'krksZ ds lkFk tekur ij NksM+ fn;k tk;A

¶12

1& vkosfndk foospuk ;k ijh{k.k ds nkSjku vfHk;kstu lk{;ksa ds lkFk NsM + NkM+ ugha djsxhA

¶13

2& vkosfndk vfHk;kstu lkf{k;ksa o ihfM+r@f’kdk;rdrkZ dks Mjk;sxh@/kedk;sxh ughaA

¶14

3& vkosfndk U;k;ky; ds vkns’kksa dk ikyu djsxh] og ijh{k.k ds nkSjku fcuk dksbZ vuko’;d LFkxu

¶15

fy, fu;r frfFk ij U;k;ky; esa mifLFkr gksxh rFkk ijh{k.k esa bZekunkjh ls lg;ksx djsxhA

¶16

4& vkosfndk tekur ij fjgk gksus ds ckn tekur dh Lora=rk dk nq:i;ksx ugha djsxh vkSj fdlh

¶17

Hkh vijkf/kd xfrfof/k esa fyIr ugha gksxh u dksbZ vijkf/kd d`R; djsxhA

¶18

5& vkosfndk izR;{k ;k vizR;{k :i ls ekeys ds rF;ksa ls ifjfpr fdlh Hkh O;fDr ;k iqfyl vf/kdkfj;ksa dks dksbZ izyksHku ;k /kedh ugha nsxh u gh muls dksbZ ok;nk djsxh] ftlds dkj.k mUgsa U;k;ky; esa rF;ksa dks mtkxj djus ls fojr jguk iM+sA

¶19

mijksDr 'krksZ esa ls fdlh ds mYya?ku ds ekeys esa] ijh{k.k U;k;ky; vkosfndk dh tekur fu;ekuqlkj jn~n djus dks Lora= gSA

fn0 % 8&12&2023

ds0lh0flag

2 of 2

Digitally signed by :- KAILASH CHANDRA SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

Usha v. State of U.P.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Usha v. State of U.P.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Ashish Vs State of U.P.

Aman Mishra Vs State of U.P.

Gulshan Saroj Vs State of U.P. and 3 Others

Rukum Singh Vs State of U.P.

Arshlan@ Gajja Vs State of U.P.

Arvind Kumar Vs State of U.P. and 3 Others