Allowed

Aman Mishra v. State of U.P.

Allahabad HC7 Dec 2023BAIL/43995/2023

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

In a bail application under Sections 323, 354, 366, 376, and 506 IPC, the court allowed bail after noting contradictions in the victim's statements and lack of injury. The applicant, a student with no prior record, was ordered to appear regularly and not seek adjournments.

What did the court decide?

The applicant was released on bail with a personal bond and sureties, subject to conditions regarding court appearance, no adjournments, and strict compliance with trial schedules.

Aman Mishra Vs State of U.P. — Bail and Remand | Allahabad HC (2023)

¶1

Neutral Citation No. - 2023:AHC:232193

¶2

Court No. - 68

¶3

Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 43995 of 2023

¶4

Applicant :- Aman Mishra Opposite Party :- State of U.P. Counsel for Applicant :- Radhey Shyam Shukla,Vipul Shukla Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.

¶5

Hon'ble Dr. Gautam Chowdhary,J.

¶6

Heard learned counsel for the applicant, learned A.G.A for the State and perused the record.

¶7

It has been argued by learned counsel for the applicant that the applicant is innocent and has been falsely implicated in the present case. Learned counsel further submits that the incident is alleged to have taken place on 16.05.2023 whereas the missing report was registered on 19.05.2023 and that the victim was recovered on 26.05.2023 but the F.I.R. was lodged on 07.06.2023 without there being any plausible explanation of such delay. Learned counsel further submits that though the victim in her statement recorded under Sections 161 and 164 Cr.P.C. has levelled allegation of rape against the applicant but during the course of recovery of the victim, the victim has specifically stated that her parents want to marry her inspite of the fact that she wants to continue her study and due to anger and annoyance on 16.05.2023 without intimating anyone, she had gone to Himachal Pradesh. It is thus contended that statements are itself contradictory. Learned counsel further submits that the victim is major aged about 22 years, who is student of M.A. and that the medico legal report shows that no injury seen on the person of the victim, further the supplementary report also shows that no spermatozao seen in a

¶8

given slide. It is thus contended that the applicant has been falsely implicated in the present case. Several other submissions in order to demonstrate the falsity of the allegations made against the applicant have also been placed before the Court. The circumstances which, according to the counsel, led to the false implication of the accused have also been mentioned. It has also been assured on behalf of the applicant that he is ready to cooperate with the process of law and shall faithfully make himself available before the court whenever required and is also ready to accept all the conditions which the Court may deem fit to impose upon him. He next submits that applicant is languishing in jail since 02.07.2022 having no criminal history.

¶9

Per contra, learned A.G.A. has opposed the prayer for bail of the applicant by contending that the innocence of the applicant cannot be adjudged at pre trial stage, therefore, he does not deserve any indulgence. In case the applicant is released on bail he will again indulge in similar activities and will misuse the liberty of bail.

¶10

Considering the entire facts and circumstances of the case, submissions of learned counsel for the parties, nature of evidence, and all attending facts and circumstances of the case, without expressing any opinion on merits of the case, this Court is of the view that the applicant has made out a case for bail. Hence the bail application is allowed.

¶11

Let applicant Aman Mishra involved in Case Crime No. 299 of 2023 (Case No. 20751 of 2023) under Sections 323, 354, 366, 376 (2) (N), 506 I.P.C., Police Station Civil Lines, District Budaun, be released on bail on furnishing a personal bond and two heavy local sureties each of the like amount to the satisfaction of the court concerned subject to the following conditions:-

¶12

I. The applicant shall file an undertaking to the effect that he shall not seek any adjournment on the dates fixed for evidence and the witnesses are present in court. In case of default of this condition, it shall be open for the trial court to treat it as abuse of liberty of bail and pass orders in accordance with law.

¶13

II. The applicant shall remain present before the trial court on each date fixed, either personally or through his counsel. In case of his absence, without sufficient cause, the trial court may proceed against him under Section 229-A of the Indian Penal Code.

¶14

III. In case, the applicant misuses the liberty of bail and in order to secure his presence proclamation under Section 82 Cr.P.C. is issued and the applicant fails to appear before the court on the date fixed in such proclamation, then, the trial court shall initiate proceedings against him, in accordance with law, under Section 174-A of the Indian Penal Code.

¶15

IV. The applicant shall remain present, in person, before the trial court on the dates fixed for (i) opening of the case, (ii) framing of charge and (iii) recording of statement under Section 313 Cr.P.C. If in the opinion of the trial court default of this condition is deliberate or without sufficient cause, then it shall be open for the trial court to treat such default as abuse of liberty of his bail and proceed against him in accordance with law.

¶16

In case of breach of any of the above conditions, it shall be a ground for cancellation of bail.

¶17

Identity, status and residence proof of the applicant and sureties be verified by the court concerned before the bonds are accepted.

¶18

Order Date :- 7.12.2023 S.Ali

¶19

Digitally signed by :- SHAUKAT ALI High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

Aman Mishra v. State of U.P.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Aman Mishra v. State of U.P.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Cases cited

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Pyare Lal Vs State of U.P.

Babloo Vs State of U.P.

Shailesh Vs State of U.P.

Ashish Vs State of U.P.

Gulshan Saroj Vs State of U.P. and 3 Others

Shamsul Rahman @ Shamsur Rahman Vs State of U.P.