Allowed

Aas Mohammad v. State of U.P.

Allahabad HC23 Nov 2023BAIL/50256/2023

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Court allowed a second bail application by Aas Mohammad. Relying on the right to a speedy trial under Article 21, overcrowding in jails, and a recent Supreme Court judgment regarding speedy trial, bail was granted without expressing an opinion on the merits of the case. The applicant must fulfill specific conditions regarding evidence tampering and attendance.

What did the court decide?

Release on bail with a personal bond and two sureties, subject to conditions of not tampering with evidence, attending all court dates, and appearing for framing of charge and Section 313 Cr.P.C.

Aas Mohammad Vs State of U.P. — Bail and Remand | Allahabad HC (2023)

¶1

Neutral Citation No. - 2023:AHC:222125

¶2

Court No. - 64

¶3

Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 50256 of 2023

¶4

Applicant :- Aas Mohammad Opposite Party :- State of U.P. Counsel for Applicant :- Irshad Ahmad Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.

¶5

Hon'ble Siddharth,J.

¶6

Heard learned counsel for the applicant and learned A.G.A. for the State.

¶7

This is second bail application. First bail application of the applicant was rejected by this court on 18.08.2023 directing the trial court on conclude the trial within a period of six months.

¶8

However, learned counsel for the applicant submits that before the trial court PW-I, PW-II and PW-III have been examined, who have been declared hostile as they have not supported the prosecution case. Applicant is in jail since 06.05.2023.

¶9

Learned AGA has opposed the prayer for bail but could not dispute the above submissions.

¶10

Keeping in view the nature of the offence, evidence, complicity of the accused; submissions of the learned counsel for the parties noted above; finding force in the submissions made by the learned counsel for the applicant; keeping view the uncertainty regarding conclusion of trial; one sided investigation by police, ignoring the case of accused side; applicant being under trial having fundamental right to speedy trial; larger mandate of the Article 21 of the Constitution of India and recent judgment dated 11.07.2022 of the Apex Court in the case of Satendra Kumar Antil vs. C.B.I., passed in S.L.P (Crl.) No. 5191 of 2021 and considering 5-6 times overcrowding in jails over and above their capacity by the under trials and without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, the Court is of the view that the applicant has made out a case for bail. The bail application is allowed.

¶11

Let the applicant, Aas Mohammad, involved in Case Crime No.284 of 2023, under Sections 306 I.P.C, Police Station Gajraula, District- Amroha be released on bail on his furnishing a personal bond and two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of the court concerned subject to following conditions. Further, before issuing the release order, the sureties be verified.

¶12

(i) The applicant shall not tamper with the evidence or threaten the witnesses.

¶13

(ii) The applicant shall file an undertaking to the effect that he shall not seek any adjournment on the dates fixed for evidence when the witnesses are present in Court. In case of default of this condition, it shall be open for the Trial Court to treat it as abuse of liberty of bail and pass orders in accordance

¶14

with law.

¶15

(iii) The applicant shall remain present before the Trial Court on each date fixed, either personally or as directed by the Court. In case of his absence, without sufficient cause, the Trial Court may proceed against him under Section 229-A of the Indian Penal Code.

¶16

(iv) In case the applicant misuse the liberty of bail during trial and in order to secure his presence, proclamation under Section 82 Cr.P.C. is issued and the applicants fail to appear before the Court on the date fixed in such proclamation then the Trial Court shall initiate proceedings against him in accordance with law under Section 174-A of the Indian Penal Code.

¶17

(v) The applicant shall remain present in person before the Trial Court on the dates fixed for (i) opening of the case, (ii) framing of charge and (iii) recording of statement under Section 313 Cr.P.C. If in the opinion of the Trial Court absence of the applicant is deliberate or without sufficient cause, then it shall be open for the Trial Court to treat such default as abuse of liberty of bail and proceed against him in accordance with law.

¶18

In case of breach of any of the above conditions, the complainant is free to move an application for cancellation of bail before this court.

¶19

Identity and residence proof of the applicant and sureties be verified by the court concerned before the bonds are accepted.

¶20

Order Date :- 23.11.2023 SS

¶21

Digitally signed by :- SURENDAR SINGH NARANG High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

Aas Mohammad v. State of U.P.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Aas Mohammad v. State of U.P.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Cases cited

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Shanti Devi Vs State of U.P.

Arjun Vs State of U.P.

Kamalnath Vs State of U.P.

Preeti Vs State of U.P.

Aalam Vs State of U.P.

Dharmendra Vs State of U.P. and 3 Others