Arjun v. State of U.P.
Case brief
What is this about?
Bail application dismissed for lack of prosecution as applicant did not appear on the listed date and trial status was unclear.
What the court decided
Neutral Citation No. - 2023:AHC:221577
Court No. - 64
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 52969 of 2019
Applicant :- Arjun Opposite Party :- State of U.P. Counsel for Applicant :- Birendra Shanker Pandey Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.
Hon'ble Siddharth,J.
- List revised.
- This case is listed peremptorily today.
- No one responds on behalf of the applicant, like on earlier date fixed.
- It is not known whether the trial has been concluded or not.
- There is no request for adjournment of this case too.
- This bail application, is accordingly, dismissed for want of prosecution.
Parties & counsel
- applicant
Arjun
- respondent
State of U.P.
Coram
Siddharth
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Allahabad HC
- Decided on
- · November
- Registered
- Case no.
- BAIL/52969/2019
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court