Gaya Prasad v. State of U.P. and 3 Others
Case brief
What is this about?
In this bail application, the Allahabad High Court heard an application for anticipatory bail filed by Gaya Prasad. The court heard arguments from both the applicant and the prosecution regarding the merits of the case before passing the order.
What did the court decide?
null
What the court decided
Court No. - 78
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 4969 of 2023
Applicant :- Gaya Prasad Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. And 3 Others Counsel for Applicant :- Ajay Pandey Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.,Prashant Drivedi
Hon'ble Dr. Gautam Chowdhary,J.
वररममनदमणणणकपककररजममनरपमररनमपत, आववदकगयमपसमदककओरसवमम०अ०स० 351/2022 अनरग धमरम 363/ 366/ 376(3)/ 323/ 506/ 420 भम०दद०वव०, एवदअदरग धमरम 5( जव ) (II)/6 पमकसस अधधवनयम, रमनममदझनपमर, धजलमककशममबबममजममनरपरममककरनवहवरमपसरमरवकयमगयमहह।
आववदककवववदमनअधधवकम, एवदववदमनअपरशमसककयअधधवकमकससमनमररमपतमवलबकमपररशबलन वकयम।
आववदककवववदमनअधधवकमनवरकरपसरमरवकयमवकआववदककसइसपकररममगलरएवदफजरढदगसवझझठम फदसमयमगयमहह, उसनवकधररअपरमधकमरररनहहवकयमहह,
इसनयमयमलयकवआदवशवदनमदक 22/03/2023 कवअनमपमलनममपबवडरमरवशझआजनयमयमलयकवसमक उपणसररहहधजसककवशनमखर उनकवववदमनअधधवकमनवककपबवडरमकमकरनहहवकवहअपनवपरबगयम पसमदकवसमररमजब-खमशबरहनमचमहरबहहउसकवपरबएवदससमरमलबजनउसववकसबभबपकमरसवपरवशमननहह कररवहह।आववदकवनदरषहहररमवहइसपकररममवद० 10.07.2022 सवकमरमगमरममवनरदहहइसधलए आववदककसजममनरपरछसडवदयमजमय।
ववदमनअपरशमसककयअधधवकमनवआववदककवववदमनअधधवकमकवरकरकमपबलववरसधकररवहहएरकर पसरमरवकयमवकआववदकदमरमकमरररअपरमधसदजवयएवदगदमभबरपककवरकमहह, इसधलएआववदककसजममनर परनछसडमजमयव।
Issues for consideration
2 issues framed by the court
Whether anticipatory bail should be granted to the applicant in the present criminal proceedings.
Whether the allegations are clearly meant to vex the applicant orsuppress genuine grievances.
Parties & counsel
- applicant
Gaya Prasad
Coram
Gautam Chowdhary
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Allahabad HC
- Decided on
- · March
- Registered
- Case no.
- BAIL/4969/2023
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court