Dinesh Kumar v. State of U.P.
Case brief
What is this about?
In bail application under Sections 306, 506 IPC, the Allahabad High Court held that objections to bail raised by the State were not overcome by the applicant. The court found no sufficient ground for enlargement and rejected the application.
What did the court decide?
Bail application rejected; applicant not enlarged on bail.
What the court decided
A compact analysis
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Neutral Citation No. - 2023:AHC:233843
Court No. - 65
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 48986 of 2023
Applicant :- Dinesh Kumar Opposite Party :- State of U.P. Counsel for Applicant :- Ankit Srivastava Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.
Hon'ble Rajeev Misra,J.
- Heard Ms. Sonakshi Arora, Advocate, holding brief of Mr. Ankit Srivastava, the learned counsel for applicant, the learned A.G.A. for State.
- Perused the record.
- This application for bail has been filed by applicant- Dinesh Kumar seeking his enlargement on bail in Case Crime No. 488 of 2023, under Sections 306, 506 IPC, Police Station-Modinagar, District-Ghaziabad during the pendency of trial.
- Record shows that in respect of an incident, which is alleged to have occurred on 29.08.2023 a delayed FIR dated 05.09.2023 was lodged by first informant Anil and was registered as Case Crime No. 488 of 2023, under Sections 306, 506 IPC, Police StationModinagar, District- Rural (Commissionate Ghaziabad) In the aforesaid F.I.R., applicant Dinesh Kumar has been nominated as solitary named accused.
Issues for consideration
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the accused is entitled to enlargement on bail during the pendency of trial.
Whether the evidence of complicity established by the court below warrants rejection of the bail application.
Parties & counsel
- applicant
Dinesh Kumar
- respondent
State of U.P.
Coram
Rajeev Misra
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Allahabad HC
- Decided on
- · December
- Registered
- Case no.
- BAIL/48986/2023
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court