Salman v. State of U.P.
Case brief
What is this about?
The High Court rejected the bail application of Salman, accused of dowry death under Sections 498-A, 304-B IPC and D.P. Act. The court directed the lower court to conclude the trial within one year.
What did the court decide?
Bail application rejected; trial directed to be concluded within one year.
What the court decided
Neutral Citation No. - 2023:AHC:236113
Court No. - 64
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 46083 of 2023
Applicant :- Salman Opposite Party :- State of U.P. Counsel for Applicant :- Rajesh Kumar,Navin Kumar Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.,Satish Kumar Tyagi
Hon'ble Siddharth,J.
Heard learned counsel for the applicant; Sri Satish Kumar Tyagi, learned counsel for the informant; learned AGA for the State and perused the material placed on record.
The instant bail application has been filed on behalf of the applicant, Salman, with a prayer to release him on bail in Case Crime No. 1051 of 2022, under Sections 498-A, 304-B IPC and Section 3/4 D.P. Act, Police Station Hapur Nagar, District- Hapur, during pendency of trial.
There is allegation against the applicant of causing dowry death of his wife in the FIR.
Learned counsel for the informant and learned AGA have vehemently opposed the prayer for bail of the applicant.
This Court after hearing the learned counsels for the parties does not finds any ground for enlarging the applicant on bail at this stage.
Issues for consideration
1 issue framed by the court
Whether bail should be granted to the applicant accused of causing dowry death during the pendency of trial.
Parties & counsel
- applicant
Salman
- respondent
State of U.P.
Coram
Siddharth
Case details
As recorded by the court registry
- Court
- Allahabad HC
- Decided on
- · December
- Registered
- Case no.
- BAIL/46083/2023
Similar cases
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court