The court granted bail to the applicant in a criminal case involving grievous hurt and insult, noting a two-day FIR delay and contradictions between Section 161 Cr.P.C. statements and the FIR.
Released on bail on furnishing a personal bond with two sureties of Rs. 25,000/- each with conditions to attend hearings and not tamper with evidence.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Neutral Citation No. - 2023:AHC:211993
Court No. - 44
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 45439 of 2023 Applicant :- Nageshwar @ Shakti Opposite Party :- State of U.P. Counsel for Applicant :- Naveen Kumar Yadav Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.
Hon'ble Pankaj Bhatia,J.
(a) The applicant shall execute a bond to undertake to attend the hearings;
(b) The applicant shall not commit any offence similar to the offence of which he is accused or suspected of the commission; and
(c) The applicant shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police officer or tamper with the evidence.
Order Date :- 3.11.2023 Sachin
Digitally signed by :- SACHIN TIWARI High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the applicant is entitled to bail considering the delay in lodging FIR and contradictions in the investigation material?
Whether the applicant can be released on bail by furnishing a personal bond with sureties in the specified criminal cases?
4 provisions across 2 enactments
Nageshwar @ Shakti
State of U.P.
Pankaj Bhatia
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
