Allowed

Harichandra v. State of U.P.

Allahabad HC3 Nov 2023BAIL/45388/2023

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

This bail application was allowed. The applicant, already on bail in a gang chart case and in custody since February 2023, was released on bail in Crime/FIR No.18 of 2023 under the UP Gangsters Act by furnishing a personal bond with two sureties of Rs.25,000 each and under standard conditions.

What did the court decide?

Release on bail with personal bond and two sureties of Rs.25,000 each and standard undertaking conditions.

Harichandra Vs State of U.P. — Bail and Remand | Allahabad HC (2023)

¶1

Neutral Citation No. - 2023:AHC:212090

¶2

Court No. - 44 Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 45388 of 2023 Applicant :- Harichandra Opposite Party :- State of U.P. Counsel for Applicant :- Nand Kishor Mishra Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.

¶3

Hon'ble Pankaj Bhatia,J.

¶4

Heard learned Counsel for the applicant as well as learned A.G.A. and perused the record.

¶5

Submission of Counsel for the applicant is that the applicant is on bail in the solitary case shown in the gang chart. The copy of the bail order is on record. He further submits that other than the cases shown in the gang chart, the applicant is also on bail and the same have been explained. The applicant is in custody since 22.02.2023.

¶6

Per contra, learned A.G.A. has opposed the bail prayer of the applicant.

¶7

Considering the facts and circumstances of the case as well as submissions made by learned counsel for the parties and also perusing the material on record, and keeping in view the fact that the applicant has already been enlarged on bail in the aforementioned case shown in the gang chart and without expressing any opinion on merit of the case, I am of view that the applicant is entitled for bail.

¶8

Thus, the present application is allowed.

¶9

Let the applicant Harichandra be released on bail in Case Crime/ FIR No.18 of 2023, under Section 3(1) of the U.P. Gangsters and Anti-Social Activities (Prevention) Act, 1986 registered at Police Station Charkhari, District Mahoba on his furnishing a personal bond with two sureties of Rs.25,000/- each to the satisfaction of court concerned with the following conditions:

¶10

(a) The applicant shall execute a bond to undertake to attend the hearings;

¶11

(b) The applicant shall not commit any offence similar to the offence of which he is accused or suspected of the commission; and

¶12

(c) The applicant shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police officer or tamper with the evidence.

¶13

Order Date :- 3.11.2023 Sachin

¶14

Digitally signed by :- SACHIN TIWARI High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

Harichandra v. State of U.P.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Harichandra v. State of U.P.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Mangal Singh Vs State of U.P.

Abhishek Vs State of U.P.

Azam Vs State of U.P.

Ganga Singh and Another Vs State of U.P.

Mohammad Adnan Vs State of U.P.

Nageshwar @ Shakti Vs State of U.P.