Allowed

Shyamveer v. State of U.P.

Allahabad HC23 Nov 2023BAIL/44994/2023

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

This is a bail application under the UP Gangsters Act. The applicant argued false implication and police rivalry. The High Court allowed bail subject to a personal bond and two sureties, with conditions to appear before the trial court and the SHO.

What did the court decide?

The applicant is released on bail on furnishing a personal bond and two sureties, subject to specific conditions including appearance before the SHO once a month.

Shyamveer Vs State of U.P. — Bail and Remand | Allahabad HC (2023)

¶1

Neutral Citation No. - 2023:AHC:222209

¶2

Court No. - 75

¶3

Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 44994 of 2023

¶4

Applicant :- Shyamveer Opposite Party :- State of U.P. Counsel for Applicant :- Durgesh Kumar Pandey,Ajay Kumar,Rajesh Kumar Pandey Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.

¶5

Hon'ble Umesh Chandra Sharma,J.

¶6

Supplementary affidavit filed on behalf of the applicant is taken on record.

¶7

Heard learned counsel for the applicant, learned AGA for the State and perused the record.

¶8

By means of the present bail application, the applicant seeks bail in Case Crime No.322 of 2023, under Section 2/3 of UP Gangsters and Anti-Social Activities (Prevention) Act, 1986, Police Station Shikarpur, District Bulandshahr, during the pendency of trial.

¶9

It is argued by the learned counsel for the applicant that the prosecution under the Gangsters Act has been launched against the applicant on the basis of two cases shown in the gang chart which are triable by the Magistrate in which he has been enlarged on bail. He has been falsely implicated in the present case due to police rivalry. He is not the member of any gang. It is further contended that there is criminal history of eleven more cases against the applicant, which has been explained in paragraph-3 of the supplementary affidavit. There is no likelihood of his abscondence or tampering with the evidence. The applicant is languishing in jail since 22.09.2023. In case the applicant is released on bail, he will not misuse the said liberty.

¶10

Learned AGA opposed the prayer for bail but has not disputed the aforesaid submissions advanced by the learned counsel for the applicant.

¶11

Having regard to the facts, circumstances and the submissions made but without commenting on merits of the case, this Court is of opinion that the applicant is entitled to be enlarged on bail. Accordingly, the bail application is allowed.

¶12

Let the applicant - Shyamveer , involved in the aforesaid case crime be released on bail on his furnishing a personal bond and two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of the court concerned subject to the conditions that he:

¶13

(i) shall appear on the date fixed by the trial court;

¶14

(ii) shall not tamper with the prosecution evidence;

¶15

(iii) shall not pressurize the prosecution witnesses;

¶16

(iv) shall appear before the concerned SHO to show or establish his bona fide on any day of the first week of every month until further order of the trial court.

¶17

In case of breach of any of the above conditions, the prosecution shall be at liberty to move bail cancellation application before this Court.

¶18

Order Date :- 23.11.2023 Shahroz

¶19

Digitally signed by :- SHAHROJ ALAM High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

Shyamveer v. State of U.P.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Shyamveer v. State of U.P.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Durga Prasad Singh Vs Union of India

Sumit Vs State of U.P.

Ankit Vs State of U.P.

Sachin Vs State of U.P.

Praveen Vs State of U.P.

Jitendra Verma Vs State of U.P.