Allowed

Indraraj v. State of U.P.

Allahabad HC1 Nov 2023BAIL/44990/2023

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

In Criminal Misc. Bail Application No. 44990 of 2023, the Allahabad High Court allowed the bail application of Indraraj, who was in custody since 28.08.2023 under the U.P. Gangsters Act. The Court granted bail after noting that the applicant had already been granted bail in multiple other cases.

What did the court decide?

The applicant was released on bail on furnishing a personal bond and two reliable sureties of Rs.25000/- each, subject to attendance, no commission of further offence, and no tampering with evidence.

Indraraj Vs State of U.P. — Bail and Remand | Allahabad HC (2023)

¶1

Neutral Citation No. - 2023:AHC:209661

¶2

Court No. - 44

¶3

Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 44990 of 2023

¶4

Applicant :- Indraraj Opposite Party :- State of U.P. Counsel for Applicant :- Ashish Kumar Singh Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.

¶5

Hon'ble Pankaj Bhatia,J.

¶6

Heard learned counsel for the applicant, learned AGA and perused the record.

¶7

The applicant seeks bail in Case Crime No. 609 of 2023, under section 3(i) U.P. Gangsters and Antisocial Activities (Prevention) Act, 1986, P.S. Chandpur, District Bijnor.

¶8

Learned counsel for the applicant has submitted that three cases have been shown in the Gang Chart and in both the cases, the applicant has been granted bail. Other than that, the applicant has also been implicated in three other cases and in all the cases, he is also on bail. The applicant is in jail since 28.08.2023. It has also been submitted that there is no possibility of the applicant's fleeing away from the judicial process or tampering with the witnesses. Learned counsel submits that in case the applicant released on bail, he will not misuse the liberty of bail and will cooperate in trial.

¶9

Learned AGA has opposed the prayer for bail but not contradicted the aforesaid fact.

¶10

Considering the fact that the applicant has been granted bail in all the cases shown against him, the applicant is entitled for the bail. Thus, the bail application is allowed.

¶11

Let the applicant Indraraj be released on bail in aforesaid first information report number on his furnishing a personal bond and two reliable sureties of Rs.25000/- each with the following conditions:

¶12

(a) The applicant shall execute a bond to undertake to attend the hearings;

¶13

(b) The applicant shall not commit any offence similar to the

¶14

offence of which he is accused or suspected of the commission; and

¶15

(c) The applicant shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police officer or tamper with the evidence.

¶16

Order Date :- 1.11.2023 Faridul

¶17

Digitally signed by :- FAREEDUL HASAN High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

Indraraj v. State of U.P.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Indraraj v. State of U.P.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Sharukh @ Totla Vs State of U.P.

Murasleen Alias Bholu Vs State of U.P.

Ashish Vs State of U.P.

Santraj @ Santra Vs State of U.P.

Pankaj Yadav Vs State of U.P.

Laeek Qureshi Vs State of U.P.