Allowed

Pankaj Yadav v. State of U.P.

Allahabad HC1 Nov 2023BAIL/44904/2023

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

This court allowed a bail application filed by Pankaj Yadav. The applicant, detained since 17.08.2023, was already on bail in another case under the U.P. Gangsters Act. The court directed his release on personal bond with two sureties.

What did the court decide?

The applicant Pankaj Yadav to be released on bail in Case Crime 526 of 2023 on personal bond with two sureties of Rs. 25,000/- each.

Pankaj Yadav Vs State of U.P. — Bail and Remand | Allahabad HC (2023)

¶1

Neutral Citation No. - 2023:AHC:209468

¶2

Court No. - 44

¶3

Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 44904 of 2023

¶4

Applicant :- Pankaj Yadav Opposite Party :- State of U.P. Counsel for Applicant :- Janardan Yadav Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.

¶5

Hon'ble Pankaj Bhatia,J.

¶6

Heard learned Counsel for the applicant as well as learned A.G.A. and perused the record.

¶7

Submission of Counsel for the applicant is that the applicant is on bail in the solitary case shown in the gang chart. The copy of the bail order is on record. He further submits that other than the cases shown in the gang chart, the applicant is also on bail and the same have been explained. The applicant is in custody since 17.08.2023.

¶8

Per contra, learned A.G.A. has opposed the bail prayer of the applicant.

¶9

Considering the facts and circumstances of the case as well as submissions made by learned counsel for the parties and also perusing the material on record, and keeping in view the fact that the applicant has already been enlarged on bail in the aforementioned case shown in the gang chart and without expressing any opinion on merit of the case, I am of view that the applicant is entitled for bail.

¶10

Thus, the present application is allowed.

¶11

Let the applicant Pankaj Yadav be released on bail in Case Crime 526 of 2023, under Section 3(1) of the U.P. Gangsters and Anti-Social Activities (Prevention) Act, 1986 registered at Police Station Jeeyanpur, District Azamgarh on his furnishing a personal bond with two sureties of Rs.25,000/- each to the satisfaction of court concerned with the following conditions:

¶12

(a) The applicant shall execute a bond to undertake to attend the hearings;

¶13

(b) The applicant shall not commit any offence similar to the offence of which he is accused or suspected of the commission; and

¶14

(c) The applicant shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police officer or tamper with the evidence.

¶15

Order Date :- 1.11.2023 Faridul

¶16

Digitally signed by :- FAREEDUL HASAN High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

Pankaj Yadav v. State of U.P.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Pankaj Yadav v. State of U.P.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Sharukh @ Totla Vs State of U.P.

Murasleen Alias Bholu Vs State of U.P.

Ashish Vs State of U.P.

Santraj @ Santra Vs State of U.P.

Indraraj Vs State of U.P.

Laeek Qureshi Vs State of U.P.