Jaris Vs State of U.P.

Neutral Citation No. - 2023:AHC:206286

Court No. - 44

Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 44365 of 2023

Applicant :- Jaris Opposite Party :- State of U.P. Counsel for Applicant :- Sunil Kumar Tiwari Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.

¶5

Hon'ble Pankaj Bhatia,J.

¶6

1. Heard learned counsel for the applicant, learned AGA and perused the record.

¶7

2. The FIR in question was lodged against as many as 18 persons. Out of the said, four persons against whom similar allegations were levelled have been enlarged on bail vide separate orders.

¶8

3. Learned AGA has opposed the bail application.

¶9

4. Considering the fact that the allegations levelled against the applicant are similar to the co-accused who have been enlarged on bail, the applicant is entitled to be enlarged on bail on the ground of parity. In view thereof, the application is allowed.

¶10

5. Let the applicant Jaris be released on bail in FIR No.0156 of 2023, under Section 147, 148, 149, 323, 307, 504 IPC, Section 7 of Criminal Law (Amendment) Act & Section 3/25/27 of Arms Act, P.S. Bahsuma, District Meerut on his furnishing a personal bond with two sureties of Rs.25,000/- each to the satisfaction of court concerned with the following conditions:

¶11

(a) The applicant shall execute a bond to undertake to attend the hearings;

¶12

(b) The applicant shall not commit any offence similar to the offence of which he is accused or suspected of the commission; and

¶13

(c) The applicant shall not directly or indirectly make any inducement, threat or promise to any person acquainted with the facts of the case so as to dissuade him from disclosing such facts to the Court or to any police officer or tamper with the evidence.

¶14

Order Date :- 30.10.2023 nishant

¶15

Digitally signed by :- NISHANT MOHAN High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

Jaris v. State of U.P.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Jaris v. State of U.P.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Kunwar Sahab Singh Vs Distt. Magistrate Pratapgarh and 2 Others

Madhu Devi Vs State of U.P. Thru. Secy. Food U.P. Govt. Civil Sectt. Lko. and 6 Others

Canara Bank,Meerut Thru. Chief Manager and Constituted Attorney Mr. Bobby Seth Vs Debt Recovery Tribunal,Lucknow and 3 Others

Abhay Yadav Vs State of U.P.

Nayeem Vs State of U.P.

Ajay @ Ajju Vs State of U.P.