Madhu Devi v. State of U.P. Thru. Secy. Food U.P. Govt. Civil Sectt. Lko. and 6 Others
Case brief
What is this about?
This petition challenged a proposal made at a meeting where the petitioner's name was allegedly replaced by respondent no.7. The court examined the petitioner's right to object during the approval stage but found no sufficient ground for interference, leading to the disposal of the writ.
What did the court decide?
The writ petition is disposed off. No order in the matter regarding the proposed name change.