Court granted bail to Pyare Lal in a case under Section 302 IPC. Petitioner contended he was unfairly granted bail initially. The court found insufficient grounds to revoke bail despite the applicant's employment role.
Bail application of the applicant was allowed and the grant of bail was continued.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Neutral Citation No. - 2023:AHC:232344
Court No. - 68
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 49804 of 2023
Applicant :- Pyare Lal Opposite Party :- State of U.P. Counsel for Applicant :- Namit Kumar Sharma,Virendra Jaiswal Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.
Hon'ble Dr. Gautam Chowdhary,J.
orZeku nkf.Md izdh.kZ tekur izkFkZuk i=] vkosnd I;kjs yky dh vksj ls eq0v0la0 96 lu 2023] vUrxZr /kkjk 302 Hkk0na0fo0] Fkkuk xksfoUn uxj] ftyk eFkqjk esa tekur ij eqDr djus gsrq izLrqr fd;k x;k gSA
vkosnd ds fo}ku vf/koDrk ,oa fo}ku vij 'kkldh; vf/koDrk dks lquk rFkk i=koyh dk ifj’khyu fd;kA
vkosnd ds fo}ku vf/koDrk dk dFku gS fd vkosnd dks bl izdj.k esa xyr ,oa QthZ rjhds ls >wBk QWlk;k x;k gS] mlus dfFkr vijk/k dkfjr ugha fd;k gS] ?kVukLFky ls Fkkus dh nwjh ek= 2 fd0eh0 gS fQj Hkh ?kVuk dh izFke lwpuk fjiksVZ yxHkx 23 ?kaVs foyEc ls ntZ djk;h x;h gS] ftldk dksbZ Li"Vhdj.k ugha fn;k x;k gS] vkosnd dks ekSds ls gh idM+k tkuk crk;k x;k gS tcfd og vkJe esa foxr o"kksZ ls lsokHkko o vkLFkk ds fy, vkrktkrk jgrk Fkk vkSj vkJe ds dkeksa esa c<+p<+dj fgLlk ysrk jgk gS] ftlls vkJe ds mPp dk;ZdrkZ dkQh izlUu jgrs Fks rFkk vkosnd dks vkJe esa mPp LFkku nsus ds iz;kl esa Fks] vkJe ds dqN dk;ZdrkZvksa dks ;g ukxokj Fkk] blfy, vkosnd dks bl ?kVuk esa >wBk QWlk fn;k x;k gS] erd ds 'ko foPNsnu vk[;k esa tks pksVsa crk;h x;h gSa os pksVsa lCth cukus okys iyVk ls vkuk lEHko ugha gS] izFke lwpuk fjiksVZ esa ,oa lkf{k;ksa ds c;ku esa erd dks nks iyVk ekjuk crk;k x;k gS] tcfd 'ko foPNsnu vk[;k esa rhu pksVksa dk gokyk gS] vkosnd funksZ"k gS rFkk og bl izdj.k esa 30&3&2023 ls dkjkxkj es a fu:) gS] blfy, vkosnd dks tekur ij NksM+ fn;k tk;A
fo}ku vij 'kkldh; vf/koDrk us vkosnd ds fo}ku vf/koDrk ds rdksZ dk izcy fojks/k djrs gq, rdZ izLrqr fd;k fd vkosnd dks ekSds ls gh idM+k x;k gS rFkk mldks >wBk QWlk, tkus dk dksbZ dkj.k ugha gS rFkk vkosnd ds fo:) vkjksi i= Hkh izsf"kr fd;k tk pqdk gS] erd ds eR;q dk dkj.k Comma as a result of antemortem head injury crk;k x;k gS] vkosnd }kjk izFke lwpuk fjiksVZ ds vuqlkj erd ij nks okj fd, tkus o erd ds 'kjhj ij ikbZ x;h rhu pksVksa ds lEcU/k esa tks ckr dgh x;h gS og rF; lk{; dh fo"k;oLrq gS] vkosnd izFke lwpuk fjiksVZ esa ukfer vfHk;qDr gS rFkk mldh vksj ls dfFkr :i ls Lo;a dks >wBk QWlk, tkus dk dksbZ ;Fkksfpr dkj.k Hkh nf’kZr ugha
fd;k x;k gS] vkosnd }kjk dkfjr vijk/k laKs; ,oa xEHkhj izd`fr dk gS] blfy, vkosnd dks tekur ij u NksM+k tk;A
fo}ku vij 'kkldh; vf/koDrk ds rdksZ ds ifjisz{; esa i=koyh ij miyC/k lk{;ksa ds vk/kkj ij vkosnd dks tekur ij eqDr fd, tkus dk dksbZ vkSfpR; ugha gS rFkk ;g tekur vkosnu i= fujLr fd, tkus ;ksX; gSA
rn~uqlkj okn ds xq.k nks"k ij fcuk dksbZ fVIi.kh fd, gq,] vkosnd dk tekur vkosnu i= fujLr fd;k tkrk gSA
fn0 % 6&12&2023 ds0lh0flag
2 of 2
Digitally signed by :- KAILASH CHANDRA SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the applicant was unfairly granted bail previously given the gravity of the charge under Section 302 IPC.
Whether the reasons for bail granted in the initial hearing were re-examined considering the fresh structural weakness in the wall.
Pyare Lal
Dr. Gautam Chowdhary
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
