Allowed

Sachin v. State of U.P.

Allahabad HC13 Oct 2023BAIL/43790/2023

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

In this bail application under the U.P. Gangster Act, the applicant sought release pending trial. The High Court allowed the application without expressing an opinion on the merits, subject to specific conditions and surrender of bonds and sureties.

What did the court decide?

Release of the applicant on bail by furnishing a personal bond and two sureties to the satisfaction of the court concerned.

Sachin Vs State of U.P. — Bail and Remand | Allahabad HC (2023)

¶1

Neutral Citation No. - 2023:AHC:198997

¶2

Court No. - 72

¶3

Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 43790 of 2023

¶4

Applicant :- Sachin Opposite Party :- State of U.P. Counsel for Applicant :- Manish Kumar Tripathi,Umesh Kumar Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.

¶5

Hon'ble Krishan Pahal,J.

¶6

List has been revised.

¶7

Heard Sri Ashutosh Kumar Shukla, Advocate holding brief of Sri Manish Kumar Tripathi, learned counsel for the applicant, Sri Yogesh Mishra, learned A.G.A. for the State and perused the material placed on record.

¶8

By means of the present bail application, the applicant seeks bail in Case Crime No. 119 of 2023, under Section 2/3 of U.P. Gangster and Anti-Social Activities (Prevention) Act, 1986, Police Station- Teelamod, District- Ghaziabad, during the pendency of trial.

¶9

It is argued by the learned counsel for the applicant that the prosecution under the Gangsters Act have been launched against the applicant on the basis of one criminal case shown in the gang chart in which he has already been enlarged on bail by the court concerned. The details of criminal case have been mentioned in paragraph-7 to the affidavit accompanying the bail application. He has been falsely implicated in the present case due to police rivalry. He is not the member of any gang. Learned counsel has further stated that there is a criminal history of one case against the applicant, which has been explained in paragraph-8 of the affidavit. The applicant is languishing in jail since 30.10.2022. In case, the applicant is released on bail, he will not misuse the liberty of bail.

¶10

On the other hand, learned AGA opposed the prayer for bail.

¶11

Without expressing any opinion on the merits, the bail application is allowed. Let the applicant- Sachin, involved in aforementioned case be released on bail on his furnishing a personal bond and two sureties each in the like amount to the

¶12

satisfaction of the court concerned with the following conditions that :-

¶13

i. The applicant shall not tamper with the prosecution evidence by intimidating/ pressurizing the witnesses, during the investigation or trial. ii. The applicant shall cooperate in the trial sincerely without seeking any adjournment.

¶14

iii. The applicant shall not indulge in any criminal activity or commission of any crime after being released on bail.

¶15

In case of breach of any of the above conditions, it shall be a ground for cancellation of bail. Identity, status and residence proof of the applicant and sureties be verified by the court concerned before the bonds are accepted.

¶16

Order Date :- 13.10.2023 Vikas

¶17

[Krishan Pahal, J.]

¶18

Digitally signed by :- VIKAS VERMA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

Sachin v. State of U.P.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Sachin v. State of U.P.

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Aryansh Pathariya Vs State of U.P.

Mujjamil Vs State of U.P.

Hafiz @ Mohd. Hafiz and Another Vs State of U.P. and 2 Others

Rakesh Mittal @ Rakesh Kumar Mittal Vs State of U.P.

Kuddus and Another Vs State of U.P.

Devi Yadav Vs State of U.P. and Another