Disposed

Hafiz @ Mohd. Hafiz and Another v. State of U.P. and 2 Others

Allahabad HC12 Oct 2023ABAIL/11273/2023

Case brief

AI extract

What is this about?

The Allahabad High Court disposed of an anticipatory bail application under Section 438 Cr.P.C. regarding an FIR under the Cow Slaughter Act. The court declined to grant bail but directed the applicants to surrender within one month, after which a regular bail application would be decided based on the guidelines in Satender Kumar Antil.

What did the court decide?

Anticipatory bail application disposed of; applicants directed to surrender within one month; no coercive action for that period.

Hafiz @ Mohd. Hafiz and Another Vs State of U.P. and 2… — Anticipatory Bail | Allahabad HC (2023)

¶1

Neutral Citation No. - 2023:AHC:196912

¶2

Court No. - 72

¶3

Case :- CRIMINAL MISC ANTICIPATORY BAIL APPLICATION U/S 438 CR.P.C. No. - 11273 of 2023

¶4

Applicant :- Hafiz @ Mohd. Hafiz And Another Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. And 2 Others Counsel for Applicant :- Shyam Sunder Mishra,Mohd. Monis Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.

¶5

Hon'ble Krishan Pahal,J.

¶6

Heard Sri Mohd. Monis, learned counsel for the applicants as well as Sri Anit Kumar Shukla, learned A.G.A. for the State and also perused the record.

¶7

The present application for anticipatory bail has been filed for protection in regard to FIR/Case Crime No. 207 of 2023, under Sections 3/5ka/8 Cow Slaughter Act, P.S.- Thariyaon, District- Fatehpur.

¶8

After arguing for some time, applicants' counsel submits that the present application for anticipatory bail may be disposed of with a direction to file a regular bail application which may be decided keeping in view the guidelines as laid down by the Apex Court in the case of Satender Kumar Antil vs. Central Bureau of Investigation and another , reported in 2021 SCC Online SC 922 .

¶9

Learned A.G.A. has no objection to the prayer made by the learned counsel for the applicants.

¶10

After hearing learned counsel for the parties, no case is made out for interference u/s 438 Cr.P.C. The present anticipatory bail application is disposed of with a direction that the applicants shall surrender before the concerned court within one month from today and in case, a regular bail application is filed, the same be decided in view of the law laid down by the Supreme Court in the case of Satender Kumar Antil (supra) .

¶11

For the period of one month from today or till the time of surrender of the applicants before the concerned court, whichever is earlier, no coercive action shall be taken against the applicants- Hafiz @ Mohd. Hafiz and Mustakim , in the above case.

¶12

(Justice Krishan Pahal)

¶13

Order Date :- 12.10.2023 Shalini

¶14

Digitally signed by :- SHALINI JAISWAL High Court of Judicature at Allahabad

Hafiz @ Mohd. Hafiz and Another v. State of U.P. and 2 Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

Hafiz @ Mohd. Hafiz and Another v. State of U.P. and 2 Others

Case brief

What is this about?

What did the court decide?

What the court decided

A compact analysis

Issues for consideration

Cases cited

Statutes considered

Parties & counsel

Coram

Case details

Similar cases

Mushahid Ali and 12 Others Vs State of U.P. and Another

Kaish Mohammad @ Kaish Hussain Vs State of U.P. and Another

Sunil Kumar Chaubey Vs State of U.P. and Another

Aryansh Pathariya Vs State of U.P.

Mujjamil Vs State of U.P.

Girish Tiwari and 5 Others Vs State of U.P.