High Court enlarged the applicant on bail in a case under the Gangsters Act, 1986. The court accepted submissions that the applicant was falsely implicated and not a gang member, without commenting on merits.
Applicant released on bail with personal bond and two sureties subject to standard conditions of appearance, no tampering, and no witness pressurizing.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Neutral Citation No. - 2023:AHC:192294
Court No. - 75
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 40588 of 2023
Applicant :- Shivin Sharma Opposite Party :- State of U.P. Counsel for Applicant :- Ardhendu Shekhar Sharma,Ram Babu Sharma Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.
Hon'ble Umesh Chandra Sharma,J.
and two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of the court concerned subject to the conditions that he:
(iii) shall not pressurize the prosecution witnesses.
Order Date :- 4.10.2023 Shahroz
Digitally signed by :- SHAHROJ ALAM High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
2 issues framed by the court
Whether the applicant is entitled to be enlarged on bail in a case under the Gangsters Act, 1986, considering allegations of false implication and lack of gang membership.
Whether there is a likelihood of the applicant absconding or tampering with evidence.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Shivin Sharma
State of U.P.
Umesh Chandra Sharma
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
