The court allowed bail to Neema Devi and Seeta in a criminal trial involving theft and forgery charges. The bench noted the applicants were falsely implicated and released them on personal bond and sureties.
Release on bail on furnacece of personal bond and sureties subject to conditions regarding evidence tampering and trial attendance.
This page shows the compact analysis of this judgement. The full analysis — procedural history, issue-by-issue holdings with ratio and obiter, advocates, and paragraph-level evidence for every claim — is being added to the record in batches and will appear here when this judgement has been through it.
Neutral Citation No. - 2023:AHC:189779
Court No. - 75
Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 38976 of 2023
Applicant :- Nema Devi And Another Opposite Party :- State of U.P. Counsel for Applicant :- Alkesh Singh Counsel for Opposite Party :- G.A.
Hon'ble Umesh Chandra Sharma,J.
i. the applicants shall not temper with the prosecution evidence; ii. the applicants shall not pressurize the prosecution witness; iii. the applicants shall appear on each and every date fixed by the trial court.
Order Date :- 3.10.2023
S.Verma
Digitally signed by :- SANDEEP KUMAR VERMA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad
1 issue framed by the court
Whether the applicants are entitled to bail considering the allegations of false implication and lack of criminal antecedents.
1 provisions across 1 enactments
Neema Devi and Seeta
State of U.P.
Umesh Chandra Sharma
As recorded by the court registry
Judgements on the same questions, provisions and authorities, from every court
